Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. Pages: 1
#1 2010-07-05 23:08:12
Gravitomagnetic effect from Cern versus Neutrinoflow?Well, with such an extensive gravitomagnetic effect as from cern the neutrinoes would form big objects in space that moves towards earth. Last edited by LQ (2010-07-06 01:29:51) I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #2 2010-07-07 03:47:50
Re: Gravitomagnetic effect from Cern versus Neutrinoflow?What are "Neutrinoflow" and "Neutrinomass"? You seem to be the only one using those words...
How has this effect been observed?
Why? "In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..." #3 2010-07-07 09:47:34
Re: Gravitomagnetic effect from Cern versus Neutrinoflow?neutrino - coined by Fermi, little neutral one. No mass no charge. A ghost particle. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #4 2010-07-07 09:51:34
Re: Gravitomagnetic effect from Cern versus Neutrinoflow?I know about neutrinos. I also about the mass of a neutrino. What I don't know, is what "neutrinomass" is. "In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..." #5 2010-07-07 09:54:08
Re: Gravitomagnetic effect from Cern versus Neutrinoflow?Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
Pages: 1
|