Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #126 20100628 01:13:26
Re: Is this cool with you?
D the gravity would make it die I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #127 20100628 03:04:46
Re: Is this cool with you?Hi LQ; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #128 20100628 03:10:56
Re: Is this cool with you?gravity would make it die, because space does not expand quick enough to pull the bacteriafood outwards. I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #129 20100628 03:16:58
Re: Is this cool with you?Hi LQ; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #130 20100628 03:29:57
Re: Is this cool with you?allright then. So it doesn't die of physical heat? that it burns up eventually? you have an infinite cooler? I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #131 20100628 03:47:38
Re: Is this cool with you?Ah hah, caught you there. Of course I do, look at the threads name. In here it is all cool. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #132 20100628 04:00:43
Re: Is this cool with you?Eventually there would form diseases/viruses that killed all of the bacterias or that they evolved, eventually they wouldn't sustain. Questions on that? Last edited by LQ (20100628 04:01:28) I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #133 20100628 04:05:17
Re: Is this cool with you?Yes, if you want but you are in the the wrong thread for that. This thread is just for math questions. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #134 20100628 04:18:35
Re: Is this cool with you?
Why did the vector cross the road? It wanted to be normal. #135 20100628 11:46:57
Re: Is this cool with you?Hi mathsyperson; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #136 20100706 22:47:54
Re: Is this cool with you?ABC is a triangle (AB = AC) and apex angle of 20°, BC = AE. Find <AEC. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #137 20100711 12:09:21
Re: Is this cool with you?In post 125 you ask what is the next number in the sequence?
#138 20100711 12:11:11
Re: Is this cool with you?Hi Jimmy; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #139 20100728 06:28:37
Re: Is this cool with you?Between 1700 and 2010 inclusive how many years have 365 days in them. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #140 20100802 17:57:05
Re: Is this cool with you?Between 1700 and 2010 inclusive how many years have 365 days in them? #141 20100802 17:58:25
Re: Is this cool with you?Hi jimmyR; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #142 20100802 18:13:20#143 20100802 18:15:33
Re: Is this cool with you?I cannot say. I thought there would be a couple of answers to that one. Probably no one saw it. Generally, I post in obscurity. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #144 20100811 06:22:01
Re: Is this cool with you?B says "hey I found a neat proof that a square is the rectangle with the biggest area for a fixed perimeter. and it doesn't use any calculus. Instead it uses a little error analysis borrowed from numerical analysis. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #145 20100825 22:18:34
Re: Is this cool with you?Here is another! The fun just keeps on! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #146 20100904 01:17:29
Re: Is this cool with you?Someone is given this problem to solve: You must solve for g in: He merrily substitutes (a,b) for x , y and gets. solving for g: g is the y intercept. The equation of the tangent is: He/she is happy they have solved for the tangent to c^2 = xy for any a,b,c. B says) That is beautiful, that is exactly what I would have done. A says) For the first time I agree with B that is nice. C says) Agreed. D says) Man, I wish I could do that. Do you agree with our panel of experts? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #147 20100911 22:11:59
Re: Is this cool with you?The two worm problem. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #148 20100924 08:00:12
Re: Is this cool with you?A and B continue the argument from In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #149 20100930 17:17:24
Re: Is this cool with you?A simple one! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #150 20101016 13:54:50
Re: Is this cool with you?Well, I'm happy to be back on mathisfun! Last edited by Fruityloop (20101016 14:01:09) The eclipses from Algol (an eclipsing binary star) come further apart in time when the Earth is moving away from Algol and closer together in time when the Earth is moving towards Algol, thereby proving that the speed of light is variable and that Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity is wrong. 