Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2010-06-10 08:24:48
How do programs integrate to infinity?How do non-symbolic programs integrate to infinity? sometimes using a large upper bound isnt good enough Visit calccrypto.wikidot.com for detailed descriptions of algorithms and other crypto related stuff (not much yet, so help would be appreciated). #2 2010-06-10 11:08:11
Re: How do programs integrate to infinity?Hi calccrypto; If we try to use simpsons rule on it we need 100 panels to get .66585. If we now transform the integral into: Now using simpsons rule and 100 panels we get .666666666 This is a much better answer for the same amount of work. Same thing for your question. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #3 2010-06-10 12:27:13
Re: How do programs integrate to infinity?so the functions are transformed some how? how would that work for a small program? a large library of familiar functions? that would be crazy Visit calccrypto.wikidot.com for detailed descriptions of algorithms and other crypto related stuff (not much yet, so help would be appreciated). #4 2010-06-10 12:34:45
Re: How do programs integrate to infinity?Hi calccrypto; This numerator is an upper incomplete gamma function and you only have to look up how to evaluate it. The abramowitz stegun book might help. There is a neat continued fraction: In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #5 2010-06-10 13:02:22
Re: How do programs integrate to infinity?oops. forgot that dt Visit calccrypto.wikidot.com for detailed descriptions of algorithms and other crypto related stuff (not much yet, so help would be appreciated). #6 2010-06-10 13:05:53
Re: How do programs integrate to infinity?Yes, there are some other forms, that might be even easier for computation. It looks pretty stable though. It is a good book and a must for numerical work. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #7 2010-06-10 13:14:04
Re: How do programs integrate to infinity?weird. i just remembered to look at wolfram, and i found another way to do it: 1 - lower_incomplete_gamma (the equation involving sigma), but the values that come out are weird. some values come out correctly, but others dont Visit calccrypto.wikidot.com for detailed descriptions of algorithms and other crypto related stuff (not much yet, so help would be appreciated). #8 2010-06-10 13:15:54
Re: How do programs integrate to infinity?The lower incomplete is not what you want. You want the upper and remember your your function divides by gamma(a). In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #9 2010-06-10 14:09:04
Re: How do programs integrate to infinity?ooh... could you? im terrible with finding programs i need/want Visit calccrypto.wikidot.com for detailed descriptions of algorithms and other crypto related stuff (not much yet, so help would be appreciated). #10 2010-06-10 14:30:10
Re: How do programs integrate to infinity?You don't need to: Try that. It is accurate for s >= 2 and z > 0. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #11 2010-06-11 02:53:40
Re: How do programs integrate to infinity?Thanks! but what about for s<2? Visit calccrypto.wikidot.com for detailed descriptions of algorithms and other crypto related stuff (not much yet, so help would be appreciated). #12 2010-06-11 02:56:53
Re: How do programs integrate to infinity?Hi calcrypto; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #13 2010-06-11 03:26:42
Re: How do programs integrate to infinity?im afraid that the equation is giving me similar incorrect values for the values i got wrong, and the correct values that i got correct. weird Last edited by calccrypto (2010-06-11 07:09:51) Visit calccrypto.wikidot.com for detailed descriptions of algorithms and other crypto related stuff (not much yet, so help would be appreciated). #14 2010-06-11 09:49:44
Re: How do programs integrate to infinity?Hi calccrypto; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #15 2010-06-11 11:23:57
Re: How do programs integrate to infinity?weird. why are government publications so annoying??? Visit calccrypto.wikidot.com for detailed descriptions of algorithms and other crypto related stuff (not much yet, so help would be appreciated). #16 2010-06-11 11:40:52
Re: How do programs integrate to infinity?They are often filled with incorrect data. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |