Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2009-06-26 21:22:28
Chess – Win – Draw – Lose ?When Computers can Calculate to the End of the Chess game tree,which is only a matter of time! They will answer an important Question,is the game of Chess for the first player to move,a Win,draw,or Loss. #2 2009-06-26 21:41:34
Re: Chess – Win – Draw – Lose ?That is a very interesting question. Draw does seem likely, as I have seen balanced endgames that were draws. "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman #3 2009-06-27 00:06:57
Re: Chess – Win – Draw – Lose ?The total computation is enormous. #4 2009-06-27 03:10:07
Re: Chess – Win – Draw – Lose ?Hi MathGuise; Last edited by bobbym (2009-06-27 04:38:04) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. Probability is the most important concept in modern science, especially as nobody has the slightest notion what it means. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. #5 2009-06-27 04:37:57
Re: Chess – Win – Draw – Lose ?Is there a proof that black can't force a win, or is it just intuitively likely? Why did the vector cross the road? It wanted to be normal. #6 2009-06-27 04:41:44
Re: Chess – Win – Draw – Lose ?Hi mathsyperson; Last edited by bobbym (2009-06-27 04:44:12) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. Probability is the most important concept in modern science, especially as nobody has the slightest notion what it means. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. #7 2009-07-07 01:50:20
Re: Chess – Win – Draw – Lose ?Well I think the computer is smarter than the most of us here. The software programmers programmed the chess software to try their best and win us EYE AM FRIENDLY, THAT'S O U NEED 2 NO, psst, Don't trust strangers, EYE AM FRIENDLY, THAT'S O U NEED 2 NO ..........psst, Don't trust strangers...... #8 2009-07-07 01:52:28
Re: Chess – Win – Draw – Lose ?Also I have win quite a couple times where I played against other people and won by black. EYE AM FRIENDLY, THAT'S O U NEED 2 NO, psst, Don't trust strangers, EYE AM FRIENDLY, THAT'S O U NEED 2 NO ..........psst, Don't trust strangers...... #9 2009-07-07 06:06:48
Re: Chess – Win – Draw – Lose ?Hi iamfriendly; Last edited by bobbym (2009-07-07 06:07:11) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. Probability is the most important concept in modern science, especially as nobody has the slightest notion what it means. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. #10 2009-08-17 23:28:44
Re: Chess – Win – Draw – Lose ?When the Chess Game Tree is finally solved! one of the most interesting Questions will be answered...which opening is the Best this debate has been going on for a long time,and also... #11 2009-08-18 13:11:20
Re: Chess – Win – Draw – Lose ?Hi MathGuise;
If you mean fully enumerating the game tree that is not likely. Fastest machines today can generate about 1 000 000 000 positions per second. The number of branches in the game tree of chess is 10^50. Some experts feel it is more like 10^120. Let's go with the lower bound. At a billion positions a second it would take 3.1709* 10^33 years to list them all. To store them we would need to turn every atom in our universe into a memory location capable of storing an entire 64 square board with pieces on it. Not likely. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. Probability is the most important concept in modern science, especially as nobody has the slightest notion what it means. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. #12 2009-08-18 22:23:19
Re: Chess – Win – Draw – Lose ?MathGuise was Anthony R. Brown, again harassing the forums. "In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..." #13 2009-08-19 03:20:07
Re: Chess – Win – Draw – Lose ?Hi Ricky; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. Probability is the most important concept in modern science, especially as nobody has the slightest notion what it means. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. #14 2009-11-21 09:06:22
Re: Chess – Win – Draw – Lose ?Can anybody tell me more about the Deep Blue ? like how does it work, i heard that's the most intelligent chess computer EYE AM FRIENDLY, THAT'S O U NEED 2 NO, psst, Don't trust strangers, EYE AM FRIENDLY, THAT'S O U NEED 2 NO ..........psst, Don't trust strangers...... #15 2009-11-21 17:51:33
Re: Chess – Win – Draw – Lose ?Hi iamfriendly; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. Probability is the most important concept in modern science, especially as nobody has the slightest notion what it means. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. |