You are not logged in.
1+1=2
Last edited by Koagula (2009-11-03 22:49:35)
Offline
This is a very important result indeed. As Bertrand Russell and Alfred North Whitehead showed in their magnum opus Principia Mathematica, it is necessary to prove that 1 + 1 = 2 in order to re-invent mathematics with set theory.
[align=center]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE657F9sqyQ[/align]
Last edited by JaneFairfax (2009-11-04 08:25:22)
Offline
An astounding mathematical breakthrough! Nobody knew that for years! Centuries, even! It is such a childish concept to say that 1+1=2 is "kindergarten math".
I'll be here at least once every decade.
Offline
Hi;
Jane is probably zillions of light years ahead on this but from what I understand that statement 1+1=2 only popped up in the book some 350 pages in. In effect the first 300 or so pages was the preparatory work to that result. Russell and Whitehead were trying to prove that math (set theory particularly) was consistent. Like Hilbert he was trying to remove the pardoxes from set theory. The work of Frege, Church, Turing and Godel proved that his approach could never work.
The book was never finished and is said to have broken him.
Last edited by bobbym (2009-11-04 10:32:17)
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
So if you hit 2 small hits, the result would be a critical?
I refute this argument since if you eat one apple you are content, but if you eat 2 you are bored, and so 1+1 is not twice as good as 1, it is a totally different experience. But mathematically I suppose it is true.
Last edited by LQ (2009-11-04 10:32:51)
I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy...
Offline