Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,915

bobbym wrote:

Its ctrl + pause/break : this key is above the arrow keys (at the top).

Ah - found it! I'd never used that key before and must have skimmed over it when looking for it.

It stops program execution, as you said.

Thanks!

"The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 90,672

Hi phrontister;

I tried that, but I got the same incorrect responses as before. Maybe I didn't code it correctly. I'll try again...

```
for n=10 to 0 step -1/5
print n
next n
```

Notice how instead of getting 0 he gets 0.20539126e-14, but at least the for next loop terminates.

*Last edited by bobbym (2009-08-14 13:30:06)*

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

**I agree with you regarding the satisfaction and importance of actually computing some numbers. I can't tell you how often I see time and money wasted because someone didn't bother to run the numbers.**

Offline

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,915

Hi Bobby,

bobbym wrote:

Notice how instead of getting 0 he gets 0.20539126e-14, but at least the for next loop terminates.

Yes - I'll have to remember that for situations where that is important (or maybe I should make it a habit anyway).

Some day this quirk won't exist and we won't have to dream up workarounds...and we'll laugh at the clunky ways of the old days.

"The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 90,672

Hi phrontister;

This problem will always exist with floating point arithmetic, you can delay it with more digits of precision, but when used incorrectly it will bite you.

Exact integer and rational arithmetic do not have this problem but it is not always possible to use them.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

**I agree with you regarding the satisfaction and importance of actually computing some numbers. I can't tell you how often I see time and money wasted because someone didn't bother to run the numbers.**

Offline