Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2009-08-12 07:09:24
More affordable alternative to TI graphing calculators?My administration will not approve of my request to purchase enough TI graphing calculators for my freshman algebra class because it doesn't fit in the budget. The TI-83 Plus is about $100 and the technology hasn’t changed in years. Would anyone else like to see another brand, like HP or Sharp, come out with a similar, more affordable graphing calculator for students?? #2 2009-08-12 07:41:01
Re: More affordable alternative to TI graphing calculators?Hi JMM1212; Last edited by bobbym (2009-08-12 07:41:53) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #3 2009-08-12 07:49:08
Re: More affordable alternative to TI graphing calculators?I agree that a computer is better than a calculator, but students are not allowed to use them on tests... #4 2009-08-12 08:10:13
Re: More affordable alternative to TI graphing calculators?Hi JMM1212; Last edited by bobbym (2009-08-13 05:52:37) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #5 2009-09-09 20:45:53
Re: More affordable alternative to TI graphing calculators?Do the students really need graphing calculators? I would use a simpler calculator like Casio FX-82ES (seems to be called FX-300ES in the states). Last edited by inkube (2009-09-09 20:47:29) #6 2009-09-10 02:04:03
Re: More affordable alternative to TI graphing calculators?Hi inkube; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |