Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #27 2009-05-23 05:58:04
Re: Kurre's ExercisesHi Kurre; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. Probability is the most important concept in modern science, especially as nobody has the slightest notion what it means. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. #29 2009-05-23 13:27:34
Re: Kurre's ExercisesHi Bo Li; Anyway, how does this prove # 14 In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. Probability is the most important concept in modern science, especially as nobody has the slightest notion what it means. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. #31 2009-05-23 22:31:08
Re: Kurre's Exercises
it does not hold for all m and n #32 2009-05-23 22:37:58
Re: Kurre's ExercisesThanks Kurre for providing the answer to #7. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. Probability is the most important concept in modern science, especially as nobody has the slightest notion what it means. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. #33 2009-05-25 19:40:00
Re: Kurre's Exercises#15let k,n be positive integers, a a nonzero real, k<n+1 . Show that: both with real analysis and by using residue calculus edit: i did a mistake so i dont know if its possible to do this using residues, but that does not mean it must be impossible Last edited by Kurre (2009-05-26 04:43:09) |