Math Is Fun Forum

  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#1 2007-10-26 12:11:55

rune2402
Banned
Registered: 2007-10-23
Posts: 32

Argument validity. Is this argument valid?

Some philosophers are absent minded.
Zitta N is a philosopher.
_____________________________
Zitta N is absent minded.

Offline

#2 2007-10-26 12:54:51

MathsIsFun
Administrator
Registered: 2005-01-21
Posts: 7,711

Re: Argument validity. Is this argument valid?

Some humans are female.
You are a human.
... you are female?


"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..."  - Leon M. Lederman

Offline

#3 2007-10-26 13:29:55

rune2402
Banned
Registered: 2007-10-23
Posts: 32

Re: Argument validity. Is this argument valid?

Wow! Thank. That is soooo funny. Talk about a revelation. Thank you so much. I wonder what a venn diagram or euler might look like for this.

Offline

#4 2017-02-24 15:56:35

Monox D. I-Fly
Member
From: Indonesia
Registered: 2015-12-02
Posts: 2,000

Re: Argument validity. Is this argument valid?

rune2402 wrote:

Wow! Thank. That is soooo funny. Talk about a revelation. Thank you so much. I wonder what a venn diagram or euler might look like for this.

Philosophers would be the universe set. Absent-minded if the set inside that universe set and Zitta N is outside of it.


Actually I never watch Star Wars and not interested in it anyway, but I choose a Yoda card as my avatar in honor of our great friend bobbym who has passed away.
May his adventurous soul rest in peace at heaven.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB