I was thinking about the 90° angle between the x, y, and z-axis.
It is all so perfect. So I said you need two independent real
numbers (cooridinates) to describe a point in a plane. Then I
thought about putting the x and y axis at a 10° angle instead of
90°, and noticed you could still get to all the points on the plane.
Next I attempted to find a way to describe all the points on a plane
with only 1 number. Is it possible? So at first I played around with
the idea of a spiral that was so close together at each pass around that
it would take infinite times to make up some area, but this idea soon
I decided was dumb and incomprehensible. Then I came up with a
plausible idea, if you don't mind a jumbled mess in place of two nice
x and y axis. So this is only a first try at this and I hope to come up
with refined examples that use negative numbers as well as decimals
later, but for now I am only using whole numbers. I started at (-1,1)
and called this 1. Then (0,1) would be 2. Here is a chart.
(x,y) 1-D number
-1,1 1
0,1 2
1,1 3
-1,0 4
0,0 5
1,0 6
-1,-1 7
0,-1 8
1,-1 9
At this point we expand the grid larger by factor of ten and make the intervals
smaller by a factor of ten. So we continue. Some duplicate points will exist
as we go over the previous ones.
-10,10 10
-9.9,10 11
-9.8,10 12
-9.7,10 13
-9.6,10 14
-9.5,10 15
-9.4,10 16
-9.3,10 17
-9.2,10 18
-9.1,10 19
-9.0,10 20
-8.9,10 21
-8.8,10 22
This continues to the right until we hit 10,10 and
then the rows continue down to form a square grid.
Then we will be at approximately the number 201 * 201 + 9.
Next we again expand the grid ten times larger and ten times more intricate.
-100,100 40420
-99.99,100 40421
-99.98,100 40422
-99.97,100 40423
etc. etc. You get the picture.
Does anybody think it is interesting??
Do you think by going to infinity, you will pass through both a large surface area
and work toward getting more intricate as well?
Obviously it is a jumbled mess, but if you ignore the mess, it is pretty cool,
hence in the "This is Cool" category.