Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #26 20131015 10:17:43
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!I'm not sure how you could do it without modulo and why you thought you should not use it. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #27 20131015 10:19:24
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!Because if I were going to use computational means why should I just use them half way? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #28 20131015 11:22:16
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!How is DP half way? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #29 20131015 11:47:32
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!First you must tell me what DP stands for. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #30 20131015 20:48:03
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!Dynamic programming. Which is basically your first method in this thread. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #31 20131015 22:01:18
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!What method? I do not think I had a method. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #32 20131015 22:07:41
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!Ah, wait. Wrong thread. Post #28 is also in the wrong thread. Sorry. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #33 20131015 22:11:21
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!I do not think so. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #34 20131015 22:16:21
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!Do not think what? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #35 20131015 22:17:40
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!That it would be necessary to do a computation on it. I agree that it probably has some method. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 