Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

## #26 2013-10-15 10:17:43

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!

I'm not sure how you could do it without modulo and why you thought you should not use it.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #27 2013-10-15 10:19:24

bobbym

Offline

### Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!

Because if I were going to use computational means why should I just use them half way?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #28 2013-10-15 11:22:16

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!

How is DP half way?

And even if it is, I'd trump doing only half of it (?) computationaly if it gets me the result faster.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #29 2013-10-15 11:47:32

bobbym

Offline

### Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!

First you must tell me what DP stands for.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #30 2013-10-15 20:48:03

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #31 2013-10-15 22:01:18

bobbym

Offline

### Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!

What method? I do not think I had a method.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #32 2013-10-15 22:07:41

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!

Ah, wait. Wrong thread. Post #28 is also in the wrong thread. Sorry.

Anyway, by looking at the problem, I'd say it is a book problem, which probably means that it has a non-computational solution, so, I do not know why you think this one has to be done computationally at all.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #33 2013-10-15 22:11:21

bobbym

Offline

### Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!

I do not think so.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #34 2013-10-15 22:16:21

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!

Do not think what?

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #35 2013-10-15 22:17:40

bobbym

Offline

### Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!

That it would be necessary to do a computation on it. I agree that it probably has some method.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.