Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #3 20131014 19:05:39
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!Hi jacks The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #5 20131014 19:14:13
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!Hi bobbym The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #6 20131014 19:15:46
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #7 20131014 19:33:08
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!I thought about using 4 divisibility rules, but I do not think that will do much. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #8 20131014 19:35:43
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!If we could get 4 congruences that could be solved with the CRT. I just do not see how. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9 20131014 19:38:39
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!Well a+b+c+d≡:7 (mod 9). And we can easily calculate it mod 11. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #11 20131014 19:48:45
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!4, actually. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #12 20131014 20:02:26
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!The numbers are 0, 3, 5, 2 which sum to 10. Which is 1 mod 9. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #13 20131014 20:06:56
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!Actually, the problen is that there are 3 digits missing in post #1. ab basically stsnds for 64352 in that number. Last edited by anonimnystefy (20131014 20:07:18) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #14 20131014 22:58:05
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!I am not following you. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #15 20131014 23:18:37
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!Compare these two: The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #16 20131014 23:21:01
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!That is true, I did not notice that. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #17 20131015 01:12:20
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!I guess we'll have to wait for the OP to clear the question out. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #18 20131015 01:18:59
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #19 20131015 01:51:17
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!I've seen a similar one with 28!, but not this one. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #20 20131015 01:53:15
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!Found only this:http://forum.math.uoa.gr/viewtopic.php? … p;p=211113 which suggests that your answer is still the correct one. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #21 20131015 01:56:11
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!That post is like 3 years old but has the same username! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #22 20131015 02:00:17
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!Hi The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #23 20131015 08:07:28
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!I remember doing this question in a BMO1 paper, I think. #24 20131015 08:19:41
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!Ah, thanks. Found it: The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #25 20131015 09:59:10
Re: calculation of (a,b,c,d) in 34!Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 