Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

• Index
•  » Help Me !
•  » Question on Gaussian Probability Density funtion ..!!

## #1 2013-10-07 19:45:54

praneethbobba
Novice

Offline

### Question on Gaussian Probability Density funtion ..!!

Hi All

If the mean of a Gaussian random variable is '4' and variance is '3'. Then what is the probability P(X=4) = ?

Praneeth

## #2 2013-10-07 20:23:55

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Question on Gaussian Probability Density funtion ..!!

Hi

Welcome to the forum!

Are you maybe looking for P(X<=4) or maybe P(X>=4), because, P(X=4) is just 0.

Last edited by anonimnystefy (2013-10-07 20:24:36)

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #3 2013-10-07 20:41:04

praneethbobba
Novice

Offline

### Re: Question on Gaussian Probability Density funtion ..!!

hi anonimnystefy

Nah.. actually i'm looking for the probablity at a specific value of X. Can you explain why it will be Zero ? It would be really helpful

Thanks
Praneeth

## #4 2013-10-07 20:47:18

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Question on Gaussian Probability Density funtion ..!!

Hi

If X has a continuous distribution, P(X=a) is 0 for any constant a. Since the Gaussian (normal) distribution is continuous, P(X=4).

If you say why you need to calculate that probability, maybe I can help you set it up better.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #5 2013-10-07 20:50:43

praneethbobba
Novice

Offline

### Re: Question on Gaussian Probability Density funtion ..!!

oh.. is it ? Actually that was a question in a text I'm following !!  I'm new to this subject ... can you provide any links so that I can get some more understanding on random variable / process  concepts ?

Thanks
Praneeth

## #6 2013-10-07 20:56:50

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Question on Gaussian Probability Density funtion ..!!

Hi

Look at this Wiki article:http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuo … stribution. Under the section Continuous Probability Distribution it is explained why the probability of a single value of a continuous random variable is 0.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #7 2013-10-07 21:51:28

praneethbobba
Novice

Offline

### Re: Question on Gaussian Probability Density funtion ..!!

That's some gud stuff man. Thanks a lot

Praneeth

## #8 2013-10-07 21:52:15

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Question on Gaussian Probability Density funtion ..!!

You're welcome!

If you have any other questions be sure to ask!

Last edited by anonimnystefy (2013-10-07 21:54:43)

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #9 2013-10-08 18:34:39

bob bundy
Moderator

Offline

### Re: Question on Gaussian Probability Density funtion ..!!

hi praneethbobba

Welcome to the forum.

In the real world (as distinct from the made up world of mathematics) you can never measure something with complete accuracy.

eg.  Let's say a manufacturer makes 10 centimetre rods.  Could you ever measure a rod and discover that it is exactly the right length?

How are you measuring it?  With a ruler?

The marks on a ruler have thickness so under a microscope where on the ruler are you saying it is 10 cm?  (see picture below)

OK.  Let's say we decide to use a clever optical measuring device that can achieve an accuracy to the size of a wavelength of light.  That still means you have a small amount of doubt about the measurement.

Use an electron microscope?  Still limited by the size of an electron.

Measure to the nearest quark?  ..... And so on.

In reality, there is no such thing as an exact measurement.  The best we can ever do is to say a measure is x   +/-   e, where e is the amount by which our measurement could be wrong.

For that reason the probability of any exact measurement with a continuous distribution will always be zero.

The manufacturer has to proceed like this:

"I know my customers expect the rods to be accurate to 0.01 cm so what's the probability of not getting a reject ie P(9.99 < X < 10.01)  ?"

Bob