Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #26 20130620 23:25:28
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsBut to get that you had to introduce new points. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #28 20130620 23:39:33
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsYes, but that polynomial needs 3 known points to be a unique quadratic. You have 2 and one unknown point. You can not determine that quadratic knowing only two. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #29 20130620 23:43:07
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsHi Herc11 The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #30 20130620 23:43:59
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsWhat is wrong with post #9? Can anyone get A and B? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #31 20130620 23:46:09
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsI need a of four quadratics. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #32 20130620 23:47:31
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsOk. You are right. But I am confused with the equation of defining a2. #33 20130620 23:48:08
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsMe too, and putting more points on the drawing does not give them to me. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #34 20130620 23:49:29
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsI need you to give me the leading coefficient of two more quadratics through those two unknown points and a point on each of those. Last edited by anonimnystefy (20130620 23:50:27) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #36 20130620 23:52:13
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsFor post #9? Yes any additional info would help. I have been asking the OP to state the full problem. It might be possible to get more info out of it. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #37 20130620 23:56:27
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomials
I think so. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #38 20130620 23:57:52
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsFrom just the first coefficient? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #39 20130620 23:59:16
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsFirst coefficient of four quadratics and a point on each. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #40 20130621 00:00:40
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsWant to use post #9 and I will provide the two more quadratics since I know what A and B is? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #42 20130621 00:02:39
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsIt is more information than you provided in post #1 so I am willing to post the challenge. It is worth a shot. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #44 20130621 00:04:55
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsI know the answer for post #9 only because I created it. No one else can know it from that information ( maybe ). I can give 2 more quads. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #45 20130621 00:05:01
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsHi bobbym The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #46 20130621 00:07:14
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsIt does not, we just went from there. But so far no one has proved it is possible with n quadratics. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #47 20130621 00:10:42
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomials
Thats why I am asking. #48 20130621 00:12:27
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsI am going to say that with 4 quadratics or 176 of them you still can not define the two points. That is my opinion. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #49 20130621 00:14:23
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomials
Okay, then give me the first coefficient of four quadratics and a point on each of them and I will try finding the 2 intersections. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #50 20130621 00:17:26
Re: Define the intersection points of polynomialsYes, give some time. I am very interested in your result. Please hold. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 