Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #101 20130427 22:53:33
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersOk. If you start calling me a mathematician I'll know our friendship is off. "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do."  Ted Nelson #102 20130428 06:44:56
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersMathematics is beautiful. We are lucky to be able to study it from the viewpoint of an amateur. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #103 20130428 09:30:06
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi bobbym #104 20130428 09:49:08
Re: My New Twin Prime Numbers
It is very easy for men to become power mad. Even easier than becoming greedy. The scientific community in general had to withstand many centuries of persecution. Then they rose to the position of power where they promptly began to persecute people and differerent ideas. They began to stifle and repress new ideas that might endanger their position of power. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #105 20130428 16:55:03
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi bobbym #106 20130428 19:10:01
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #107 20130428 19:50:10
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi bobbym #108 20130428 20:03:39
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #109 20130510 20:16:24
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersI am revising the equation and making it harder to get new resulting prime. I named it Perfect Twin Prime Numbers. The revised equation is given as follows: Where all Ps are prime numbers. Example: #110 20130511 03:21:26
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi Stangerzv, "569" should read "659". Last edited by phrontister (20130531 21:21:43) "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do."  Ted Nelson #111 20130511 09:27:45
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersWoke up to this: Pₜ=3: Pₜ=5 Pₜ=7 Pₜ=11 Pₜ=13 Pₜ=17 Pₜ=19 Last edited by phrontister (20130531 21:22:33) "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do."  Ted Nelson #112 20130511 17:01:47
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi phrontister #113 20130526 18:31:27
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersOne thing that I notice about these prime pairs is that, all of their digital root for n>1 would be in pair of 2^y (y=1..3) and 1 or 7, example, (2,1), (2,7),(4,1), (4,7),(8,1), (8,7) and special case (7,7) when n is a square number (i.e n=9). This indicates that the prime distribution is not random but organized. Unless someone could find the counter examples. Perhaps for n=9, adding this into digital root system won't change anything as 9 has zero value in the decimal system and this is why the prime pairs would have the same digital roots. This applies for all n which has digital root of 9. Last edited by Stangerzv (20130526 18:55:09) #114 20130530 02:12:05
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi Stangerzv, Last edited by phrontister (20130531 21:23:34) "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do."  Ted Nelson #115 20130530 09:18:25
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi Stangerzv, Last edited by phrontister (20130531 21:24:14) "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do."  Ted Nelson #116 20130530 11:16:36
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersKool, it seems I had overlooked the primes and new pairs of digital roots, (5,7) and (4,8) #117 20130530 13:50:23
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi Bobby, "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do."  Ted Nelson #118 20130530 14:01:53
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #119 20130530 14:12:42
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersPerfect...thanks! Last edited by phrontister (20130530 14:14:41) "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do."  Ted Nelson #120 20130530 14:15:09
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersThat is called a replacement rule. It says turn 0 into 9. Note the syntax because these replacement rules work on anything. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #121 20130530 14:35:11
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersOk...thanks for that. Learnt something new. Found it under 'Rule' in the M docs. This code will expand the information given in post #111 to show primes' sums and digital roots: Last edited by phrontister (20130530 15:42:53) "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do."  Ted Nelson #122 20130530 15:34:07
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi phrontister #123 20130530 16:07:58
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi Stangerzv, Then at: There are also a couple more after that, at Pₓ=70207 and Pₓ=74167. No doubt there will be more. Still looking for {1,7}, but have to go out now for a while. Maybe there will be an answer waiting for me when I get back. Last edited by phrontister (20130531 21:25:02) "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do."  Ted Nelson #124 20130530 16:27:38#125 20130530 19:21:13
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi phrontister;
The replacement rules are a part of the Prolog programming language and make M unique. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 