Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#26 2013-02-26 20:11:59

anonimnystefy
Real Member
From: The Foundation
Registered: 2011-05-23
Posts: 14,883

Re: no. of divisers

Hi bobbym

I think we should stop chatting because it is abother persons thread, and also, we have already reached that magical point where I have no idea what you are talking about.


“Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

#27 2013-02-27 05:01:20

jacks
Member
Registered: 2012-11-21
Posts: 77

Re: no. of divisers

Yes Bobbym answer Given is

would you like to explain it to me. Thanks

Offline

#28 2013-02-27 05:26:57

bobbym
Administrator
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 82,980

Re: no. of divisers

Hi;

I know of nothing better than computing the divisors and then checking mod 4 for each one.

I have been researching the problem for something else but have not found anything.

Just finished reading 8 books on number theory, found 3 new was to compute the Jacobi symbol but did not find a shortcut for yours.

Last edited by bobbym (2013-02-27 12:01:44)


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB