Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

Login

Username

Password

Not registered yet?

#26 2013-02-27 19:11:59

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: no. of divisers

Hi bobbym

I think we should stop chatting because it is abother persons thread, and also, we have already reached that magical point where I have no idea what you are talking about.


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#27 2013-02-28 04:01:20

jacks
Full Member

Offline

Re: no. of divisers

Yes Bobbym answer Given is



would you like to explain it to me. Thanks

#28 2013-02-28 04:26:57

bobbym
Administrator

Offline

Re: no. of divisers

Hi;

I know of nothing better than computing the divisors and then checking mod 4 for each one.

I have been researching the problem for something else but have not found anything.

Just finished reading 8 books on number theory, found 3 new was to compute the Jacobi symbol but did not find a shortcut for yours.

Last edited by bobbym (2013-02-28 11:01:44)


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB