Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

## #1 2012-12-04 04:24:08

TheTick
Member

Offline

### Sequence Riddle

Hello! this is my first post. just fyi I love puzzles and riddles, so you may see more...

What is the next set of numbers in this sequence.

1
11
101
111011
11110101
100110111011
?

Last edited by TheTick (2012-12-04 05:03:07)

Spooooon!!!

## #2 2012-12-04 04:58:19

bob bundy
Moderator

Offline

### Re: Sequence Riddle

You can sandwich remarks between hide /hide tags.  Put these commands in square brackets.

Bob

You cannot teach a man anything;  you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

## #3 2012-12-04 05:05:46

TheTick
Member

Offline

### Re: Sequence Riddle

Thank you, didn't know if that would be acceptable in the case I wanted to add hints.

Spooooon!!!

## #4 2012-12-04 05:09:49

bob bundy
Moderator

Offline

### Re: Sequence Riddle

Hints!  Way to soon for that.  There's some really brainy members that like to try puzzles.  But some of them are asleep at the moment.

Bob

You cannot teach a man anything;  you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

## #5 2012-12-04 05:11:08

TheTick
Member

Offline

### Re: Sequence Riddle

I figured as much, but I still wanted to know just in case.

Spooooon!!!

## #6 2012-12-04 06:35:07

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Sequence Riddle

Hi

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #7 2012-12-04 11:37:52

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Sequence Riddle

Hi;

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.