Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

## #1 2012-11-29 23:37:56

Raabi
Member

Offline

### Regula Falsi method Formulae

Hello Wizards

This time, I came up with another confusion on the subject. Just over-viewing the subject, I found two entirely different (apparently, at least) formulae for the method. One is:

x1 = [a * f(b) - b*f(a)] / [f(b) - f(a)]; where a and b are two guess points.

The other is:

x = [xn - x(n-1)] / [f((xn) - f(xn-1)] * f(xn)

Are these two formulae actually the same or different for their use in different situations. Please help keeping in mind that I am just a toddler in this branch of mathematics.

I hope and wish bobbym is somewhere around.

Thanks in anticipation.

Raabi

## #2 2012-11-30 08:27:39

bobbym
Administrator

Online

### Re: Regula Falsi method Formulae

Hi;

The first one I recognize as the false position method.

The second one is slightly off.

No matter how it is phrased it is not my favorite choice for obtaining roots.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #3 2012-11-30 14:40:01

Raabi
Member

Offline

### Re: Regula Falsi method Formulae

ok, thanks and regards.

Raabi

## #4 2012-11-30 17:35:22

bobbym
Administrator

Online

### Re: Regula Falsi method Formulae

Hi;

There is also if I remember a slight difference between the secant method and regula falsi.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #5 2012-11-30 17:43:50

Raabi
Member

Offline

### Re: Regula Falsi method Formulae

Well, let me explore Secant method, and thanks again for your attention.

## Board footer

Powered by FluxBB