Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

Login

Username

Password

Not registered yet?

#76 2012-12-07 10:24:45

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

_ _ e    _ _ e _ _


Hey.
 

#77 2012-12-07 10:26:55

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Hi;

No T?

Is there an S in there?


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#78 2012-12-07 10:27:25

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

1.no\
1.nNope


Hey.
 

#79 2012-12-07 10:31:09

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

R in there?


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#80 2012-12-07 11:05:08

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

_ _ e    _ r e _ _


Hey.
 

#81 2012-12-07 11:15:54

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Ice Cream


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#82 2012-12-07 11:22:22

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

_ _ _ _ _ _   _ _ _ _ _


Hey.
 

#83 2012-12-07 11:22:58

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Let me have an S!


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#84 2012-12-07 11:25:32

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

nope8hint a name!


Hey.
 

#85 2012-12-07 11:26:46

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

There should be a T in there.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#86 2012-12-07 11:54:40

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

E?


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
 

#87 2012-12-09 03:56:17

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

_e _ _ _ _   E _ _ _ _


Hey.
 

#88 2012-12-09 07:04:30

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Must be an M?


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#89 2012-12-10 02:32:24

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

Nope.


Hey.
 

#90 2012-12-10 03:09:29

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

What about an N?


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#91 2012-12-10 04:08:38

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

Full Member
Online
Re: Hangman 1
_e _ n _ _   E _ _ _ _


Hey.
 

#92 2012-12-10 10:14:39

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Is there an A in there?


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#93 2012-12-10 10:26:19

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

_e _ n _ a _ _   E _ _ _ _


Hey.
 

#94 2012-12-10 14:13:03

phrontister
Real Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

Are this person's mum and dad called Marguerite and Paul?

Last edited by phrontister (2012-12-11 08:33:17)


"The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson
 

#95 2012-12-11 09:41:00

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

phrontister wrote:

Are this person's mum and dad called Marguerite and Paul?

No,and please,NO SPAM


Hey.
 

#96 2012-12-11 09:50:40

phrontister
Real Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

And there I was, thinking the answer could have been Leonhard Euler, born 15 April 1707 in Basel, Switzerland to Marguerite Brucker and Paul Euler. sad


"The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson
 

#97 2012-12-11 12:04:03

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Well then give me an H!


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#98 2012-12-11 12:22:50

phrontister
Real Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

Hi mathgogocart,

Sorry about the 'spam'. I can't always play with a straight bat, and I like to add some spice here and there to stir up the thought cells. But I'll desist from that...in this thread...for a while...while I remember.

I think you'll find that my disease is pretty general here on MIF, and most of us would see that as adding to the 'fun' in 'Maths Is Fun'.

In this case I thought that I'd solved the puzzle but I wanted to keep my answer secret so that others could play on. I could have used the 'hide' box, I suppose, but I chose to reveal my answer cryptically so that you would know - just by googling for the person's parents' names (ie, if you didn't already know them) - whether or not I actually had solved it.

But my answer was wrong, so I'll play on...

Could there be a 'C'?

Last edited by phrontister (2012-12-14 10:11:35)


"The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson
 

#99 2012-12-17 03:51:49

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

phrontister wrote:

Hi mathgogocart,

Sorry about the 'spam'. I can't always play with a straight bat, and I like to add some spice here and there to stir up the thought cells. But I'll desist from that...in this thread...for a while...while I remember.

I think you'll find that my disease is pretty general here on MIF, and most of us would see that as adding to the 'fun' in 'Maths Is Fun'.

In this case I thought that I'd solved the puzzle but I wanted to keep my answer secret so that others could play on. I could have used the 'hide' box, I suppose, but I chose to reveal my answer cryptically so that you would know - just by googling for the person's parents' names (ie, if you didn't already know them) - whether or not I actually had solved it.

But my answer was wrong, so I'll play on...

Could there be a 'C'?

No,your awnser,Leonard Euler is right!

_ _ _ _ _ _  _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-note a president!wavewavewavewavewave


Hey.
 

#100 2012-12-17 04:01:21

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

E?


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
 

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB