Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2012-10-12 19:51:12
ModuloCan you help me with these two problem #2 2012-10-12 20:20:23
Re: ModuloHi; Where is called the floor function and is evaluated like this: and it always rounds down to the smallest integer. Let's do the first one: -23 mod 5 You are looking for r, the remainder. a = -23 and m is the modulo, in this case 5. Now So -23 mod 5 is 2. You try the second one. Let me know what you get. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #4 2012-10-12 22:21:10
Re: ModuloHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #6 2012-10-12 23:07:52
Re: ModuloHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #7 2012-10-12 23:50:15
Re: Modulohi bobbym, You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #8 2012-10-13 00:10:13
Re: ModuloHi;
I see that now. He got the right answer too. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #9 2012-10-13 02:21:18
Re: ModuloGuys,I have another problem,my brother says that 23 mod -5 will be 3 as Euclidean division states a=bq+r and the division will be 23=(-5)*(-4)+3. #10 2012-10-13 03:15:27
Re: Modulohi Harold, You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #11 2012-10-13 19:30:24
Re: ModuloI am sorry to bug again but after you gave me the formula,i experimented a little and solution to -23 mod -5 results -43,is it correct #12 2012-10-13 20:24:25
Re: ModuloHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #14 2012-10-13 21:00:24
Re: ModuloHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #15 2012-10-13 22:43:55
Re: ModuloYou're right,i missed a minus sign,thank you a lot,you guys taught me a lot of things today. #16 2012-10-13 22:49:15
Re: ModuloHi Harold; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #18 2012-10-14 20:37:55
Re: ModuloHi bob; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #20 2012-10-14 21:02:32
Re: ModuloHi Bob; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #22 2012-10-14 21:11:05
Re: ModuloHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |