Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

## #576 2012-06-02 01:07:18

bobbym

Online

### Re: Bafflers?

The method you may have used ( solving an equation ) does not always work.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #577 2012-06-02 01:09:58

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Bafflers?

When have I said that I had been solving an equation?

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #578 2012-06-02 01:11:00

bobbym

Online

### Re: Bafflers?

That is the point. You are not showing any work. I have to guess at your proof.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #579 2012-06-02 01:12:00

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Bafflers?

I will post thr proof later today.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #580 2012-06-02 01:16:13

bobbym

Online

### Re: Bafflers?

New Problem:

We start with the sequence a0, a1, a2, a3,... with a0 being a positive integer and the recurrence

If the last digit of
is 5 or less then that digit is dropped. The process stops when
has no more digits.

1) Can you find an a0 that will produce an infinite sequence?

2) An a0 that will produce a finite sequence?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #581 2012-06-02 02:31:16

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Bafflers?

Hi bobbym

Last edited by anonimnystefy (2012-06-02 02:31:26)

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #582 2012-06-02 02:46:22

bobbym

Online

### Re: Bafflers?

Hi anonimnystefy;

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #583 2012-06-02 02:47:22

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Bafflers?

Thanks.I will start working on the new one.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #584 2012-06-02 02:53:22

bobbym

Online

### Re: Bafflers?

Hi;

I am going to take a little break, see you later.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #585 2012-06-02 02:55:02

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Bafflers?

Ok,see you later.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #586 2012-06-04 02:13:39

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Bafflers?

#### bobbym wrote:

New Problem:

We start with the sequence a0, a1, a2, a3,... with a0 being a positive integer and the recurrence

If the last digit of
is 5 or less then that digit is dropped. The process stops when
has no more digits.

1) Can you find an a0 that will produce an infinite sequence?

2) An a0 that will produce a finite sequence?

How can an infinite sequence produce a finite one?

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #587 2012-06-04 02:17:13

bobbym

Online

### Re: Bafflers?

You can have a finite sequence in this case.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #588 2012-06-04 02:18:30

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Bafflers?

I suspect that this is connected to the 9^9^9^9 problem you were trying to solve.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #589 2012-06-04 02:26:14

bobbym

Online

### Re: Bafflers?

Depends on what you mean by the word solve. In the experimental sense I solved it. But no, it is not related to that monstrosity.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #590 2012-06-04 02:27:45

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Bafflers?

You solved it and haven't told me?!

I will work on it,anyway.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #591 2012-06-04 02:30:18

bobbym

Online

### Re: Bafflers?

Sorry for the vague reference which is now confusing even me. What do you think I solved?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #592 2012-06-04 02:36:25

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Bafflers?

The 9^9^9^9 problem. Experimentally,of course.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #593 2012-06-04 02:40:44

bobbym

Online

### Re: Bafflers?

It was the only time I ever got to be a stubborn fool.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #594 2012-06-04 02:46:55

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Bafflers?

What is the solution? And how in the world did you get the answer?

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #595 2012-06-04 02:57:50

bobbym

Online

### Re: Bafflers?

Although the technique to compute such a thing was shown to me 9^9^9 times I refused to understand it. That produced a brain caniption and now I can not understand it. Anyway, I wanted a math solution to it, hahahahahahahahahahahahhahaahh!

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #596 2012-06-04 03:17:59

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Bafflers?

Can youpost a link to one of those explanations? Or send it by email?

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #597 2012-06-04 03:41:18

bobbym

Online

### Re: Bafflers?

http://www.ginac.de/CLN/binsplit.pdf

http://www.ccas.ru/personal/karatsuba/algen.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_splitting

Just shows that when those Topologists get into your favorite field then you will no longer understand it.

#### Einstein wrote:

Then Minkowski put my theory in terms of mathematics by which even I was unable to understand my own theory any longer!

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #598 2012-06-16 20:53:11

bobbym

Online

### Re: Bafflers?

New Problem:

Prove:

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #599 2012-06-24 20:17:24

gAr
Star Member

Offline

### Re: Bafflers?

Hi bobbym,

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

## #600 2012-06-24 20:54:14

bobbym

Online

### Re: Bafflers?

Hi gAr;

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.