Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#26 2012-03-03 00:27:46
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
I forgot the problem and the solution, solved it again in a different way and now cannot remember that!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#27 2012-03-03 00:30:32
- gAr
- Star Member
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
That's bad!
I'll take a note of the solution, very good recurrence.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
#28 2012-03-03 00:32:44
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
Yes, write everything down, now! Do not wait for later is a good rule.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#29 2012-03-03 00:40:14
- gAr
- Star Member
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
It's done!
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
#30 2012-03-03 00:53:10
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
Hi;
Thanks for looking at the problem. I am writing down the solution also.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#31 2012-03-03 00:57:35
- gAr
- Star Member
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
I enjoyed it.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
#32 2012-03-03 01:10:25
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
Hi;
I am going to get a little rest, see you later.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#33 2012-03-04 08:43:07
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
Hi bobbym
Can you help with getting the solution. Even these are hard for me.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#34 2012-03-04 09:05:23
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
Hi anonimnystefy;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#35 2012-03-04 09:52:08
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
Hi bobbym
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#36 2012-03-04 09:55:38
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
Hi;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#37 2012-03-04 09:58:29
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
Hi bobbym
I don't understand how you got that.
EDIT: nevermind, I got it
Last edited by anonimnystefy (2012-03-04 10:00:36)
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#38 2012-03-04 10:03:01
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#39 2012-03-04 10:07:33
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
Read #38 again.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#40 2012-03-04 10:11:07
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
Oh, I did not see that you edited your post.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#41 2012-03-04 10:15:39
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
Hi bobbym
Yes I do.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#42 2012-03-04 10:21:00
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#43 2012-03-04 10:35:30
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
Hi bobbym
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#44 2012-03-04 10:42:43
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#45 2012-03-04 10:45:51
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
On my desktop our laptop I would've took time to write all that.I just cannot force myself to LaTeX on my phone.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#46 2012-03-04 10:47:53
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
Why the heck are you using one of those dinky screened, micro keyboarded, wimpy phones instead of a desktop?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#47 2012-03-04 10:54:42
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
Because it's late.
Back to the problem.I just done the recursion, stick in 10 and I'm done?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#48 2012-03-04 10:56:40
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
Hi;
That is one way. There are others.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#49 2012-03-04 11:04:57
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
The other would be to find all the elements up to the tenth one from the formula.But the other one is the fun way.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#50 2012-03-04 11:05:57
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Bafflers?
Fun? Maybe... What if there were 10^12 iterations?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.