Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. Pages: 1 2
#1 20100415 09:12:32
Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramI believe I am a such, a maximon with that black hole radiation and size, and I want to know the radiation type and level I expose the earth to. I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #2 20100415 09:20:11
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramHi LQ; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #3 20100415 09:30:24
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramShall I link you to the particle? Last edited by LQ (20100415 09:44:24) I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #4 20100415 09:44:15
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramHi LQ; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #5 20100415 09:50:22
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramBobby, a black hole of the weight 0.5 mikrograms that doesn't evaporate by reason of being a maximon, what energyindex and energy does it release when it's on this planet? Last edited by LQ (20100415 16:19:52) I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #6 20100415 11:40:14
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramHi LQ; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #7 20100415 16:18:51
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramYou're right bobbym, that should be a half microgram, srry. I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #8 20100415 16:26:21
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramHi LQ; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9 20100415 16:56:23
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramΔE requires a time interval Δt > h / ΔE. I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #10 20100415 17:14:58
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramAccording to the site I am looking at a black hole about one onethousandth the size of a proton and having a mass of about a million metric tons, is the ideal size. Smaller than this and it just evaporates. Larger than this and it's too destructive. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #11 20100415 17:50:09
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramno, because it is a baseparticle, it cannot destroy I said. It has a constant weight of a maximon (with a still and unmoving own time frame) and cannot change in size more then what enters it and leaves it. Last edited by LQ (20100415 17:53:52) I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #12 20100415 18:38:47
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramComparing that black hole to a maximon or photon would be like comparing a galaxy to a marble. That black hole is too small to be a maximon. It probably can't exist at all. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #13 20100415 23:01:44
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramWhat makes you think so? I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #14 20100415 23:17:41
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramHi LQ; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #15 20100416 00:36:31
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramWhat if it would be a black hole, unable to evaporate, because it can't become energy, what would happen at that size? I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #16 20100416 01:24:54
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramProbably it will find another "maXimon" and they'll live happily ever after... If two or more thoughts intersect with each other, then there has to be a point. #17 20100416 01:57:47
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramHi;
I don't know. At that size and swimming in a world of strings that it can't eat. The point is how did it get there? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #18 20100416 02:43:13
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramCan it eat photons? because I can see whatever it is i see seems to be a forum anyway right now. Last edited by LQ (20100416 02:44:26) I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #19 20100416 02:57:31
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramHi LQ;
All black holes acoording to a paper written by Hawking will eventually evaporate, due to pair production at the event horizon. I don't think it can radiate photons.
Not possible. A black hole won't break apart into small pieces. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #20 20100416 03:13:00
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramI believe it can, would the pieces be 0 in size yet not in dimensions. It would then later grow either from photons or from its quantumfluctuation energy. So basically I think that they can shrink to that size and then move away without being effected by gravity, either that or through quantum traces or something. And I believe it's no black hole until it gain weight, it can gain the weight of the maximon and that's max or so. I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #21 20100416 03:17:07
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogram
What if it's a charged black hole, and can eat photons? What if the mass in the black hole can't form a pair? I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #22 20100416 04:12:27
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramThere are no photons down there in the realm of the very,very,very, tiny world of strings. This is where your black hole is. Where you put it. Sorry LQ, there just isn't anything to munch on there. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #23 20100416 06:20:34
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramI don't believe in that. I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #24 20100416 10:59:30
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramHi LQ;
Now your talking. Don't listen to bobbym, I don't.
I've heard of him. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #25 20100416 17:28:25
Re: Radiation levels of a black hole with constant size 5 nanogramBut thank you for your effort. I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy...
Pages: 1 2
