You are not logged in.
Whats all the fainting got to do with anything?
I'm confused...
(faints)
If you really can't get it I'll explain how to do it, but you really ought to learn to do this for yourself. I wouldn't really be helping you if I just did the problem for you.
Here here! But it depends on the significance of the discovery. Is this significant enough to revolution math, science, engineering, technology and business? Or even change it in the slightest way? I doubt it.
But still well said, MathIsFun! :-)
Yes, but virtually nothing in pure maths is actually useful.
BLASPHEMY! ![]()
But I take it you meant, math in itself is useless - untill applied to something.
The best kind of girl is a girl who likes math! ;-)
email me at mikau16@yahoo.com if you ever want to chat. But of course they're are plenty of awsome math wizards here to hang with.
Also note the identiy for sin(2x) and the three identities for cos(2x).
I'd really really really reccomend printing out a reference sheet of all the indentities. I have a binder of lots of difference indentities and math notes. This is math, not spelling. Understanding why a formula works is more important then remembering it. Just print out a reference sheet.
I could work it out myself but I think you should.
First I'd suggest replacing cos(3x) and sin(3x) with cos(2x + x) and sin(2x + x) then use the sum identities. We did this in the previous example. And note the identity tan (2x) = (2 tan x)/(1 - tan^2 (x) ). Also note that tan x = (sin x)/(cos x)
You can do it!
"We're super excited," said Boone, a chemistry professor. "We've been looking for such a number for a long time."
Whats he excited about? lol. Chemists...
KANSAS CITY, Missouri (AP) -- Researchers at a Missouri university have identified the largest known prime number, officials said Tuesday.
The team at Central Missouri State University, led by associate dean Steven Boone and mathematics professor Curtis Cooper, found it in mid-December after programming 700 computers years ago.
A prime number is a positive number divisible by only itself and 1 -- 2, 3, 5, 7 and so on.
The number that the team found is 9.1 million digits long. It is a Mersenne prime known as M30402457 -- that's 2 to the 30,402,457th power minus 1.
Mersenne primes are a special category expressed as 2 to the "p" power minus 1, in which "p" also is a prime number.
"We're super excited," said Boone, a chemistry professor. "We've been looking for such a number for a long time."
The discovery is affiliated with the Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search, a global contest using volunteers who run software that searches for the largest Mersenne prime.
Horray! We've got a new prime number!
...
so now what do we do with it?
Trigonometric identies:
http://www.sosmath.com/trig/Trig5/trig5/trig5.html
You should print out a reference sheet.
Ok, I'm going to use the four following identies to do this:
1. sin^2 (x) + cos^2 (x) = 1
2. sin(2x) = 2 sin x cos x
3. cos (2x) = 2 cos^2 (x) - 1
4. cos (A + B) = cos A cos B - sin A sin B
I'll refere to these as identities 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Ok. We begin with cos (3x) and note this can be written as cos (2x + 1) if we use identity 4 and let A = 2x and B = x we have:
cos(2x) cos(x) - sin(2x) sin(x)
Now I'll substitue cos(2x) using identity 3:
(2cos^2 (x) -1) cos (x) - sin(2x) sin(x)
multiplied:
2 cos^3 (x) - cos(x) - sin(2x) sin (x)
Now I'll replace sin(2x) using identity 2.
2 cos^3 (x) - cos(x) - 2sin x cos x sin x
simplified:
2 cos^3 (x) - cos(x) - 2 cos (x) sin^2 (x)
in indentiy 1, we can solve for sin^2 (x) to find sin^2(x) = 1 - cos^2(x) we replace sin^2 (x) with (cos^2 (x) -1)
2 cos^3 (x) - cos(x) - 2 cos (x)(1 -cos^2(x))
multiplied:
2 cos^3 (x) - cos(x) + - 2 cos (x) + 2 cos^3(x)
Added like terms:
4 cos^3(x) -3 cos(x) Quod Erat Demonstratum! That which was to be demonstrated:-)
yeah thats why I was only utterly perplexed for a moment.
lol. I was just really confused for a split second.
Who hasn't heard that joke? Trying to make something out of nothing, man. Adding idea's as they came to me.
forgive me if I'm wrong but isn't there a x^5/5! missing there?
Didn't work. Maybe I'm doing something wrong.
I'd love to! Saving to photobucket and copying it here is a real pain! But last couple times I tried that it didn't work. Let me try it again:
f'''''(x) = (160x^3) sin (x^2) + (32x^5 -120x) cos (x^2)
f''''''(x) = (720x^2 - 64x^6) sin (x^2) + (480x^4 - 120) cos (x^2)
WHEW! Ok, I think I did it right this time. We have to evaluate all these functions at zero. Any term that contains sin(x) or x as a factor will have a value of zero.
f(0) = 0
f'(0) 0
f''(0) = 2
f'''(0) = 0
f''''(0) = 0
f'''''(0) = 0
f''''''(0) = -120
We insert them into the appropriare places and get:
(2x^2)/2! - (120 x^6)/6!
= x^2 - x^6/6
= x^2 - x^6/3!
HORRAY! I DID IT! (wonders if it was really worth it...)
Thanks! You guys are the best!!! ;-)
f''''(x) = (16x^4 - 12) sin (x^2) - 48x^2 cos (x^2)
f'''''(x) = (160x^3) sin (x^2) + (32x^5 -120x) cos (x^2)
f'''(x) = -8x^3 cos (x^2) - 12x sin (x^2)
f''''(x) = (16x^4 - 12) sin (x^2) - 48x^2 cos (x^2)
f''(x) = -4x^2 sin (x^2) + 2 cos (x^2)
f'''(x) = -8x^3 cos (x^2) - 12x sin (x^2)
f'(x) = 2xcos(x^2)
f''(x) = -4x^2 sin (x^2) + 2 cos (x^2)
I'll right, I just had some crackers and milk so I'm ready to relive the nightmare again. I'll Find the derivatives one at a time and post them in separate replies, so you guys can check each one individually, (if you care to).
Ok. Here we go:
f(x) = sin(x^2)
f'(x) = 2xcos(x^2)
a. Find the macluarin polynomial of sin (x)
b. Find the maclaurin polynomial of sin (x^2)
c. Substitue x^2 for x in the solution to problem a. How does it compare to the solution of problem b?
Ok, a is easy enough. C is the easy way, but in b, I take it they mean to find the maclaurin series the traditional way, by taking the 1st, 2nd, 3rd.... derivatives, evaluating it at zero, and inserting it in the maclaurin polynomial.
Do you have any idea what a nightmare it is to find the maclaurin series of sin(x^2)? f(0) is 0, f'(0 is 0, f''(0) is 2, everything else is zero all the way up to the 6th derivative. Try finding the 6th derivative of sin(x^2) it takes FOREVER! I did it twice and I've now got a screaming headache! Both times the sixth derivative evaluated at zero came to -24.
so the second derivative evaluated at zero is 2, and the 6th derivative evaluated at zero is -24. All others below 6 are zero.
So these would be inserted in the second and 6th term in the maclaurin polynomial respectively.
2(x^2)/2! (-24X^6)/6!
So the first term in the macluarin series would be x^2, the next term would be -X^6/30.
The first term x^2 is correct, but the last term is supposed to be x^6/3! and obviously its not.
TWICE I did this nightmarish problem and twice I got the same result. Any idea's?
Oops! Thats it! I wrote Area = (17/4)x^2 -225x + 7225 , the middle coefficient is supposed to be -255, not -225. I checked my answer with the books anwser but I must have missed that since the numbers look so similar. All right I'll try generating that equation again.
Ok, just did the problem again. Ok this is scary, I multiplied 340*(-6)/8 on my calculator and got -255, I copied the number on paper and my hand wrote -225. Oh no..... I thought I had dislexia but now I'm sure of it! x_x
lol! Couldn't resist huh? Don't make me pull out that y = x formula to prove 1 = 2 :-P
But I think I've demonstraighted that some things cannot be proven technically, but are so obvious they don't need to be. In my oppinion, the critical number theorem is about as obvious as 2 + 2 = 4.
Ok not quite as obvious, but think about it, if f(a) and f(b) are not the maximums and/or minimums then there is to be a point somewhere between them thats higher or lower then they are. If its higher then it has to turn around to come back down, the turning points of a function are the critical numbers. Nothing to prove in my mind.