You are not logged in.
Hi Bob
The equation for x I am getting does not have a solution.
EDIT: When the chords intersect outside the circle I get the answers x=3/5 and x=18/5.
Hi Bob
Correlation does not imply causation.
Hi Agnishom
It is because nothing itself cannot exist.
Hi ganesh
Hi ganesh
Hi Agnishom
I'd say it's .
Some of us here really are old.
I don't remember anyone being really old here.
Or, you could just say that, for any integer n, x^(2n)>0.
Also, I was confused by the question. It seems, by what you wanted, that it should have been "Is f>0 for every x in R?".
Wow, that's really late!
Hi RobinM
Welcome to the forum! ![]()
What does GR stand for?
You're welcome, but I sure am hoping you are using that as a figure of speech only. ![]()
I cannot begin to imagine it! Thanks for keeping the forum clean!
You're welcome! ![]()
The problem is quite tricky!
The thing is that, fortunately, we do not get to see the ad hominem attacks, since most are moderated. What's left of their posts seems really funny, because they give themselves huge accomplishments.
Hey guys.I have a little question or just a personal wonder about them.
Question is: Is for any ?
What about ?
Fixed the post a bit.
Why would you think they cannot be positive?
Hi ganesh
Hi guys,
- look at your own responsibility ![]()
Hi brandontran
Welcome to the forum! ![]()
Oh, sorry, I read it as 1/sqrt(...). That makes it different, sorry.
I do. What do you get?
Hi;
Did you test that second answer?
Yeah.
Hi Agnishom
Did you see post #24 here?
Hi Yusuke00
The first can also be solved using x^4+x^2+1=(x^2-x+1)(x^2+x+1) without complex numbers.
For the second one, I am getting
Hi ganesh
Hi bobbym
What's the deal with the other thread?
I have an account on both of those, I think, but I do not use them. Also have a SPOJ account.