Math Is Fun Forum
You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#76 Re: This is Cool » What is the point (ordered pairs) of Graph of a function? » 2012-12-27 07:37:04
21122012 wrote:bob bundy wrote:Next question?
Bob
You wrote everything correctly but a question didn't answer.
Is that the way you want to see your "answer" being written?
That you write to me same. I am not an idiot and I understand that you write. I am itself I know. Read a question and answer it.
#77 Re: This is Cool » What is the point (ordered pairs) of Graph of a function? » 2012-12-27 07:34:49
You should really explain the notation
and .
Well!!!
It proves that VTSUALISATION is my development!!!!
Look on Visualisation:
You understand?!
#78 Re: This is Cool » New mathematic on english » 2012-12-27 07:14:20
I liked your idea except for point 4 
If all of you it execute that you will be the first who learns all keys to new mathematics
#79 Re: This is Cool » What is the point (ordered pairs) of Graph of a function? » 2012-12-27 07:06:47
Next question?
Bob
You wrote everything correctly but a question didn't answer.
#80 Re: This is Cool » What is the point (ordered pairs) of Graph of a function? » 2012-12-27 07:05:08
What are x_0 and y_0?
Look "Visualisation" in link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integration_by_parts
You understand???!!!
What is ordinate and abscissa?
You understand:
#81 Re: This is Cool » New mathematic on english » 2012-12-27 06:38:57
You mean that questions which are considered in this topic shouldn't be in other? But in this topic of Bob bundy won't write the answer, and in other will be. Then force it to answer here.
#82 Re: This is Cool » What is the point (ordered pairs) of Graph of a function? » 2012-12-27 06:34:38
hi 21122012
I am confused by what you have asked.
Are you looking for help on the fundamental theorem of calculus?
Are you wanting to know A(x) in my diagram?
Bob
No!
I want to have the answer to a question: what is the point
for function
You understand?
#83 Re: This is Cool » New mathematic on english » 2012-12-27 06:24:18
Hi bobbym.
I ask not to delete you posts from this topic. I give references to this topic to many people in Russia.
In this forum I create other topics for detailed consideration of a question.
#84 This is Cool » What is the point (ordered pairs) of Graph of a function? » 2012-12-26 11:44:31
- 21122012
- Replies: 60
Who will be able to give me the irrefragable answers.
The question N1:
"What is the point (ordered pairs) of Graph of a function for the function (if each vertical line is the function value)?"
I will prompt:
Both top limits - are coordinates of this point. And its value is equal to
a tangent of angle of an inclination of a tangent (
).What is the point (ordered pairs: (
))of Graph of a function for the function: (
)(if each vertical line is the function value (
))?#85 Re: This is Cool » New mathematic on english » 2012-12-19 06:31:27
You will be able to tell me who and when wrote the section "Visualisation" in Wikipedia.
I do not understand what you are saying. I have no idea who or what wrote that. Why would I?
Yes all right excuse simply except you nobody communicates with me from those who well knows English. I thought you to me you will help. There it is written but the translator badly translates. All right thanks and on that isn't necessary that any more you don't delete my posts.
On this link are shown rules of integration of variables and constants with the geometrical proof of formulas. From them confirmation of the conclusion drawn in start top on an inaccuracy of application of a formula
follows.
#86 Re: This is Cool » New mathematic on english » 2012-12-18 17:31:13
Bobbym, I am shocked!
Before people who didn't read my opening couldn't reach. I started them showing about three years ago. But that that now in Wikipedia nobody wanted to listen to everything laughed and spoke that it is wrong. Now I it see published. But I couldn't guess who and when it I wrote. But it is exact not earlier than 3-4 years ago! I couldn't translate Bobbym. You will be able to tell me who and when wrote the section "Visualisation" in Wikipedia.
I sent about four years ago article to ArXiv but to me refusal came. And I see now that someone published it!
#87 Re: This is Cool » New mathematic on english » 2012-12-18 13:08:51
You kept for a long time from temptation to close my threat. Here on this site guys didn't sustain very quickly, almost as in Russia.:)
Wow! Already someone understood it! ! ! Soon that I here wrote all someone calls opening! ! !
http://vladimir938.eto-ya.com/files/201 … y-part.jpg
Bobbym, Your site has an opportunity to become famous for the whole world. Order article in the magazine or the newspaper that your site was the first where new sensations are published!
#88 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » Why in this 1=0? » 2012-12-17 13:25:50
That that is understood as uncertain integral in Calculus is a nonsense! Because integration is process the return to differentiation. And differentiation is made not with function and with its increment - with its range of definition which contracts to two next elements because
Therefore result of a certain integral - part of range of definition - a function increment, and result of integral with uncertain borders of integration - all range of definition of function. And no families of functions can be! Now I to you will prepare link.
http://vladimir938.eto-ya.com/files/201 … vative.jpg
Under alim:
#89 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » Why in this 1=0? » 2012-12-17 06:54:30
and these
...
...
I looked. Arithmetics rule isn't cancelled anywhere:
#90 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » Why in this 1=0? » 2012-12-17 06:31:41
hi 21122012,
Do you understand the difference between definite integration and indefinite integration ?
Bob
hi Bob!
I understand integration best of all in the world and I already once proved you it!
It's a joke...
#91 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » Why in this 1=0? » 2012-12-17 06:25:27
Hi Bob,
if I may, it seems to me that the (logical) error is deeper:
because
is just a symbol to denote the class of antiderivatives; so, saying class=number makes me think 21122012 is totally missing the meaning of it all.
Here a problem here in what:
Calculus doesn't distinguish an arithmetic increment from a geometrical increment! ! !
Calculus - bad science! ! !
#92 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » Why in this 1=0? » 2012-12-17 06:19:59
Hi Bob
The flawed step is assuming that -Integral[1/x,x]+Integral[1/x,x]=0 instead of Integral [0,x].
You are wrong. Such formula isn't present. Here a problem in other! Here a problem in an error of Calculus!
#93 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » Why in this 1=0? » 2012-12-17 06:16:31
Hi Bob
The problem with that is that the constand of integration appears after integration... In his steps, he never actually differentiated...
#94 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » Why in this 1=0? » 2012-12-17 06:14:40
So
That looks OK to me.
Sorry bobbym
Your chance to become richer than Bill Gates has been dashed.
Bob
Give to me the website where this miracle except as here is still written?
This incorrect equality!
#95 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » Why in this 1=0? » 2012-12-16 13:27:27
It too difficult for me. I have not 1 dollar
#96 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » Why in this 1=0? » 2012-12-16 12:14:13
Here help:
:)#97 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » Why in this 1=0? » 2012-12-16 10:09:23
seems like:
waaaaa
#98 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » Why in this 1=0? » 2012-12-16 06:35:27
seems to me that. And you as think?
#99 Re: Exercises » Who knows a formula of Pythagorean numbers? » 2012-12-15 14:50:39
Do you already have an answer to the problem?
I don't want to answer at once. And that will turn out as in other topic. All will be silent or it is simple to speak: "I don't agree" but won't reason and prove disagreement. I want to arrive now more cunning. That you gradually reached before that I want to tell.
Then you won't be able to tell that you aren't right!
#100 Re: This is Cool » New mathematic on english » 2012-12-15 14:45:36
Bobbym, I didn't understand with what you don't agree?