You are not logged in.
Love the one with the guy holding the sun. Could use a police officer looking really disapproving
I suppose the one for the planets:
My Very Eager Mother Just Served Us Nine Pizzas
Is defunct now, huh? No Pizza for anyone anymore.
I really need to get back into chess. I think I'll have to learn all over again though!
Sure. I'm always happy to try and help at least.
Isn't Euclid's elements something like a dozen volumes, though? Are you doing the project on the whole thing?
Nice puzzle. It's so tempting to take that queen out with the bishop .
Think of the 4/5 and 5/8 as percentages. 4/5 and 5/8 convert to nice decimals; 0.8 (or 80%) and 0.625 (or 62.5%) respectively.
To find out what 80% of an hour is, you need to put it into other terms. An hour is 60 minutes so you need to find out what 80% of 60 is. You do that by calculating 0.8 * 60 minutes. It comes out to 48 minutes.
Do the same thing for the other one. 0.625 * 60 turns out to be 37.5 minutes.
You might know off the top of your head that 0.5 minutes is 30 seconds, but you can calculate it in the same way. 1 minute = 60 seconds. 0.5 * 60 seconds = 30 seconds.
So to bake it will take you 48 minutes. To clean your room will take you 37 minutes and 30 seconds.
As Ganesh points out, if you can leave the cake to bake and clean your room at the same time, then it will take 48 minutes. (and you get 10 minutes, 30 seconds to rest )
However, if you have to do them one after the other, then it's 48 minutes + 37 minutes + 30 seconds, which is 85 minutes, 30 seconds.
You can then subtract 60 minutes and add on an hour if you wish so that your total time is 1 hour, 35 minutes, 30 seconds.
Best of luck with your math.
Purely an academic question since the snail is using 10^-k seconds for his velocity, but was the orbit circular or elliptical and what was the min and max radius of his orbit?
Edit: Since it isn't stated, I declare the orbit to be 0 meters in circumference! The game's back on!
I wasn't really paying attention (because I was laughing too hard) but I think every single one of those is in the movie Snakes on a Plane...
Not Rhythm and Bass. That's what it says on the tin (normally). I mean "contemporary R&B".
Have a glance at Dross' Crash Course in Latex in the Help Me! forum.
It's Post 'n' Bump and I helped!
The Who, U2 (stuff from 10+ years ago...), Green Day, Nirvana, Foo Fighters, Red Hot Chili Peppers, John Fogerty, Pink Floyd, Billy Joel, Don McLean, REM, Queen, Eric Clapton, Janis Joplin.
My tastes are generally older than I am. Please excuse me while I cringe at the sheer onslaught of songs in the past 10 years that either involve some guy's sexual exploits or some teenage girl desperately trying to be strong and/or sexy. Can we get back to the songs with some kind of meaningful message now? And can singers stop labeling themselves as "R&B" if there's clearly no Blues in their songs? [/rant]
I like classical music, too. I truly respect the masters who could tell a story with an orchestra and without words. My favorite composer is Tchaikovsky, but my favorite piece is Beethoven's Fur Elise.
Failed inventions are perfectly acceptable. I just have an appreciation for insane people who get others to buy in to their insane inventions. Oddly enough, it's normally men.
Let Op(p) be the Opinion[personal] of p, where p is the sum of all a Prime Minister's acheivements.
Then Op(p) = x, where x denotes the magnitude of the greatness of Prime Minister P such that:
P1 ≤ P(1+x) ≤ Pg
EDIT: I hope 100' isn't dissapointed anymore
Don't be silly. Prime Ministers aren't Real; they're Naturals.
Yes. The set of prime ministers is a finite set of [P1,Pg] where P1 and Pg are the min and max of the personal opinion function.
My Pg is Winston Churchill.
I will try and get a copy of your paper. If I do, I will read it.
You've obviously put some work into it and you've seen fit to come onto the forum and defend it, so the least I can do is give you the benefit of the doubt; I know how math savvy the media can be.
Let Kevin Rudd be a prime number P such that P is the only prime that is a Prime Minister...
I notice there's a lot of fractions in these, so that might be where you find difficulty. Here's some rules to help:
1.
2.
3.
I've also noticed you've got stuff like this in those equations: |3-r|
The bar notation means that if the answer is negative, then remove the negative sign. It wants what we call the "absolute value". What worries me is that this is one of your questions is...
4. l 5-4p l=-7
...which doesn't really make sense.
Normally these questions have two answers. One which will give you a positive answer and one that gives you a negative answer (which is then changed to a positive answer because of the bars).
To solve these, take this example:
| 10 - x | = 7
To solve for x, you need to first solve for when the answer was positive without the effect of the bars. You can take the bars out of the equation first. So:
10 - x = 7
- x = -3
x = 3
Next you need to solve for the fact that the 7 could be positive because of the bars. So drop the bars and make the 7 a negative number:
10 - x = -7
-x = -17
x = 17
So the answers to |10 - x| = 7 is 3 or 17.
Assume the rectangle is a square. If it werent, then it would have less than the maximum possible area.
If you drew a line from one corner of the square to the other, you'd see it passes through the center of the circle. This means that the diagonal of the square is the diameter of the circle.
This diagonal also makes a triangle with two sides of the square, so we can use the pythagorean theorem to work out the sides of the square. Because the sides are the same, your equation looks like this:
d² = s² + s²
d = 2r, so:
(2r)² = s² + s²
(2r)² = 2s²
4r² = 2s²
2r² = s²
√(2r²) = s
√2* √r² = s
r*√2 = s
So the side of the square is the square root of 2 (approx 1.414) times the radius of the circle.
And it's so true. I see Patrick Stewart all the time on the Television playing that Brain Training game.
That guy must be bored! Let's throw him a party! With strobe lights, streamers, and a budget DJ.
Make it so, Number One! (I mean you Identity, of course.)
1+1=2...
That's a little too convenient, don't you think?
1. Original Saline Volume = S
S*1.12 = S2, Saline Volume #2
S2*1.25 = S3, Saline Vol #3
Substituting in for S2:
(S*1.12)*1.25 = S3
S*1.12*1.25 = S3
S*1.4 = S3
So it's the same as a 40% increase.
2.
In 15 gallons of 80% solution, the amount of fermaldehyde is:
15*0.80 = 12 gallons
The amount of Fermaldehyde per gallon of pure fermaldehyde is 1 gallon.
The amount of Fermaldehyde per gallon of 50% fermaldehyde is 0.5 gallons.
So, we're looking for the answer to these equations:
x + y = 15
x + 0.5y = 12
Where x is gallons of pure solution, and y is gallons of half solution. There should be 15 gallons of fluid between them, but 12 gallons of fermaldehyde.
If we use substitution, we can see:
x = 15 - y
so: (15 - y) + 0.5y = 12
-y + 0.5 y = -3
-0.5y = -3
y = 6
Then x = 9.
So 9 Pure gallons and 6 half gallons.