You are not logged in.
hi Calligar
just tell me the difference between 0.3 reccuring and 0.3 reccuring? then i will accept almost anything you say (not really but anyway,...).
also,an infinitesimal is just a term,but none can really be found.you cannot find any numbers greater than zero that are less than any other number.
1/infinity is not defined!
here's how you solve it:
if you got the answer from a book then it is probably wrong,or you just looked at the wrong answer. ![]()
hi SmelyMan
is this what you want:
if it is then wolfram is right!
hi loida
is that it?
hi ganesh
hi
yes,yes they are.
that's the one i am talking about.
hi MIF
nice pages!!!
i like the jokes on the cross product page but the second one i don't understand very much. ![]()
anyway,keep on the good work!
phrontister is back!
18980
80*1/8 +sqrt(9)
hi ganesh
hi rya
yes that is correct,but my point is that we have multiple ways of representing the same number.
it's just that Monty Hall gets rid of the door that has a goat!
here is a link that explains the whole thing a little better:Monty Hall Problem
hi guys
i found this topic on wikipedia,and it has some pretty good arguments.
look at it this way: 0,5 is just another way of representing 1/2,and by the same logic 0,3333... recurring is just another way of representing as 1/3.
hi ganesh
there's one here that says bobbyrq69.is that you?
hi bobbym
what's your skype name?
how do you mean calculate.it is a brute-force algorithm,nothing is calculated.
well,i don't know if i will get to it very fast.when it finds a number that can be in a box it moves the next empty box,and tries values for it,and again and again until it all fills up or it finds a box that no number can go into.in the second case it goes to the square it filled up before the one where 'no number can stand' and it tries the next possible value.
the third one.
i do have the final answer.i got the example from a Sudoku book.it has solutions in the back.
i think i don't understand what you mean...actually i know i don't understand what you mean.
hi
all rows are obviously wrong,which means that the columns and squares are obviously wrong.don't you think i already know that?isn't it obvious.i told you that there is problem around nines.
nah,i want it to put out a random matrix that will have the elements that i have put in but that it has a lot of nines...of course i do.that's why it is called Sudoku_solver. ![]()
hi bobbym
i had to go to sleep ![]()
for example if i put in:
0 2 0 0 0 9 1 4 6
9 0 6 8 0 0 0 0 2
0 5 0 6 0 0 9 0 0
0 0 0 4 9 0 7 0 0
0 0 5 7 6 8 4 0 0
0 0 3 0 2 1 0 0 0
0 0 8 0 0 4 0 9 0
7 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 4
2 4 1 9 0 0 0 3 0
it puts out:
8 2 9 9 9 9 1 4 6
9 1 6 8 4 9 9 9 2
3 5 4 6 1 2 9 7 8
6 9 9 4 9 9 7 9 9
9 9 5 7 6 8 4 1 3
4 7 3 5 2 1 8 9 9
5 6 8 9 9 4 9 9 9
7 9 9 1 3 5 2 6 4
2 4 1 9 8 9 9 3 9
the next element is 312211
i tested the first few elements,but this problem seems like it's something to do with nines.
i tried it.but there's too much to go until the first mistake.
'Put some write statements in there.' - why?
'indices' - what?
'And for heavens sake please learn how to use the debugger.' - if by that you mean using 'step into' and watches then i do.