You are not logged in.
Don't be silly, ofcourse I would exist. And as a matter of factly our sun will be our end in 5 billion years as it swallows earth. The black hole is too far away to destroy us first. Or is this some new amazing research?
But you read the previous books? you know that dumbledore obtained a ring containing a horcrux? and that he later had a different arm. Remember?
And later, there was a little note where dumbledore and harry went to obtain the other horcrux, do you remember what it said? That was the good voldermort.
Why should we shriek for help, the quarks remain conscious... It'll be an adventure! I've never actually been a black hole before, that I know of. And I couldn't, they vaporise too slowly.
Clearly, when Dumbledore summoned Voldermort, (hence the blackened hand) he made him make an unbrakeable voul (or however it's spelled), that he would allways be good or something of the likes. So what we will see in the last book is infact a good voldermort, 3 (or whatever) bad and one harry potter, So the odds will be somewhat even. Fact also remains that the good voldermort probably knows the place quite detailed where the horcruxes are. so infact, perhaps indeed one good and one/two bad voldermorts not to mention harry potter. This is ofcourse pure speculation. though I had a dream that a third wizard would run around and cast the mysterious reincarnum spell on harry, while he fights the bad voldermort. Though it was just a dream.
Plausible?
so, infactly, in the profecy for voldermort and harry potter, they mean the good guys, and neither of them can live whilst the evil he who must not be named survives.
Maybe the universe structure is like darkmatter as water and planets like the object floating in it.
I think you misunderstand dark matter. When we look out into the universe, we see galaxies moving erratically, not at all like we expect them to. It looks like there is more matter out there than what we can actually detect/expect. So it was theorized that there was dark matter creating gravity which was causing things to move oddly.
Ever occured to you that the small red shifted young far away exploding universe might have expanded faster then it expands today?
As much as we have observed, it is constant. We have no reason why it would decrease, nor have we seen it decrease. Until either of these occurs, the best conclusion is that it is in fact constant.
Yes, best conclusion ever Ricky. Would you just tell me what is left to make the matter and space expand...
Ever occured to you that the small red shifted young far away exploding universe might have expanded faster then it expands today?
the vector sum must be composed of a horizontal and a vertical vector, their sum is always constant in this case. i think. At the end of the slope that is.
1.
3.
In my opinion, the more picture, the marier.
w8, forget about grey cause this should work, let the "welcome to mathsisfun!" be puddle blue (0 red 128 green 255 blue)!
That would possibly also work very nice indeed! especially with the second version, the puddle like picture.
okay, x on top now, didn't see that sorry.
Don't worry, the limit is still 0 since the function sin(5/x) circles between one and minus one.
so +/-0
sin(that's alot)/inf = 0
Well, If you can toggle through the layouts yourself, we could have 4.
It could also be ajusted automatically by the forum clock option, if you are logged in.
But I concure, it should be dark grey then.
The first line makes use of the fact that 0.999... = 1, which is what we're trying to prove. Albeit in a long, convoluted way.
Nope. that's how you write it.
Dark grey, my friend! Everything else would look like a dead beaver or a stained road. Unless you made a cones motive. Then brown.
Else Black.
What would me even more special would be a grass pile motive, that would be really neat. Just take a picture of a grass pile and make anime of it (through computer) then scale it. The text should be dark green.
This is my proposal:
spring: dark grey on road
summer: dark green on pile of grass on road
autumn: dark brown on pile of leaves on road
winter: Grey on pile of snow on road.
basically link 1 with the welcome text in same colour but darker then the background of it.
But way back in the day, Hubble discovered something really cool. He discovered that how fast something moves away from us is proportional to the distance it is from us. This means that if something is really far away, it will be moving away from us much faster than something close to us. Of course, actual movement of matter (not from the expansion of space) can counter act this.
diagram: slow-------------------------------x-------fast movement
diagram: later-------------------------------x-------earlier time
Sorry for the dada gogo comment, i thought Ricky quoted me from another forum at an early occasion from another forum.
Mathsyperson means that whatever you say, the opposit is true since your claim is based on the wrong assumption
For instance, if we look back in time we will see the past. You argue that if we look out in space we just see the bigger picture, that is a wrong assumption.
2 bodies:
0 <---> 0
^
move away from eachother
diagram: now--------------------------------------------X--------big bang
^
faster when the universe was young
diagram: big---------------------------------------------X--------small
^
ie. faster when the universe was small(er)
Isn't it simpler to put it like this:
1 - .999... = .000...
1 - .000... = .999...
(1 - .000...)^2 = 1^2 + .000...^2 - 2*1*.000... = 1 + .000... - 2*.000... = 1 - .000... = 1
and it's the constant of proportionality that slowly decreases with time.
No, the constant is just that, constant. It does not decrease. Its currently thought to be somewhere around 71km/s for every parsec.
Yes he knows. He meant: and it's the constant of proportionality that makes a slow decreases of expansion speed with time.
Hmm I just came up with an ill-advised hypothesis:
There is no clearly defined 'boundary' of the universe, that is to say, it is infinitely large. Therefore, couldn't it have been possible that the universe has been here all along, but just that all the stars and planets erupted from one explosive from a point in this forever-existing universe? The observations by Hubble just state that everything is moving away from each other. This doesn't mean that it is the universe is expanding, it might not have anything to do with that?
Let's bend this to the better, shall we?
It's not infinitely old, then we wouldn't have come to experience this yet. Let's instead say that the size of the universe is infinit, for instance, time and space can be infinit even though we have not experienced the time ahead of us yet. That is definitely possible, we can call it destiny and eternity. Moreover, the infinite dimensional dot split to space and matter, that were non vanishing continous vector fields. in other words into something that could last. That we call the big bang. the universe might still be expanding some, but probably as you say, it is just us that move into eternity and destiny. Is that okay/nice?
when you look so far out in space you look at past events the longer out in space and back in time you look the faster the rate of expansion you see, conclusion we can draw from red shift.
What do you say, does that sound right? hence the expresion lightyear
Yes, w8 a moment and I'll check in my private library.
May I ask first, what difference would a source make?
My old physic book is in swedish you see.
Atleast they say that they didn't apply on tv. I know they do but that's what they say. They also say gravitons did not exist and that's directly from albert einsteins general relativity. Atleast from our science book we had in school. This would also mean that the mass didn't have the properties of relativity hence could travel as fast as they wanted, even though they must have known that it would make you mad.
URL condensed - Ricky
Cause the big bang expanded in overlight speed.
I've never heard anything like this, where did you get that from?
And I can almost assure you its wrong, because according to Einsteins equations, if matter is traveling faster than the speed of light, then as it looses energy, it starts traveling even faster.
Even if you are right, that is not the current view of the universe, since the scientist claims that the laws of physics were not invented by the time of the big bang. They claim that overlightspeed were legal back then.