You are not logged in.
Book was stolen and released on the net.
Here you can read about the theaft: http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=69424
Well anywho, you can still chance the spin by simulating photon EM-field in space and spinning it. Just spin the photons medium the necessary laps per second.
PS. Just not the wrong frequency, like a frequency that resonate with something bigger then an atom.
Because the galaxies spin, right?
Well that's a pretty vague explanation of it, that could all be the effect of position and movement related to big bang, the source of the space expansion energy. As you can see, different parts of the universe decayed in different speed related to eachother also. Even though the decay time percepted by itself is equally long for all decaying I would think:
http://www.thescienceforum.com/Decay---time-exp-%3D-Constant-7756t.php
Big bang did occur here, but the gravity waves have long gone declined from here. Instead the gravity waves comes from what we see of big bang today, in the same way photons do.
On a second view, you are right, there should be a background graviton radiation.
Just a question, how do you know gravitons have a spin of 2? I haven't gone through such advanced education, could you derive that mathematically please?
http://www.thescienceforum.com/A-question-on-Gravity-7725t.php
Basically I believe that gravity in reall life is very strong, but a raw force that slips past matter.
Given that, it can be converted to photons if you only give it a spin, photons would be gravitons with spin.
Given that the energy produced is very low frequent, we could use it to contact aliens and absorb the energy with resonance in certain special equipment. whether that is possible or not I don't know.
Outstanding point, if it wasn't for that there are much worse things then becoming dust.
-You can also be vaporised into space expansion energy.
And you will experience it, beyondless parts makes no entity.
Since they are beyondless.
You are a beyondless part.
But given that we become bacterias, chances are slim that we become vaporised. I'd take my chances with becomming a bacteria, as long as I don't get vaporised.
A very strong BG bacteria would solve all our problems.
Given the vaporisation capabilities.
All we have to do is exchange its toxic genes to the most un resisteable poison ever in the exact amount of killing 2 BG algies whenever attacked.
And any attacking capabilities would be taken away.
Then very soon there would be no vaporisation technology on the earth.
Even though we have thermonuclear weapons?
Laterally Speaking, no matter how your form that analogy, it is flawed. Because no one has yet removed the increased heat. If anything our thermometer is going up. Instead, the increased heat throws the global weather patterns entirely out of wack, and you can have some places getting cold Arctic air (or cold air from anywhere else) that never got it before.
Exactly. Now what to do about it...
We are not adapted to this, lol.
How about the atmosphere gets a higher variation of density in atmosphere, cause by increased temperature. That would cause colder temperature occasionally. Like bathing in air.
Just like the moon causes waves, it could cause airwaves, and given that the air becomes hotter...
It's the space that expands, not the matter. I am talking about the center of space.
And you expect all things to move away from the center?
Rather and more likely the force vector would direct you right too it. The galaxies on the other hand initially had their own special direction while space expands why they rotate. Given that it is useless to look at the movement of galaxies, the coordinates of the center given would not be precise enough.
If I am right now, we could judge that by measuring the gravity at all sides of an object.
Then move the object a bit in the direction of the force vectorsum and see how much the variation change. And then you simply make a calculation as to how far the center is in that direction.
Imagine a ball that roles around the side of a wheel, a bit like roulett.
The far away beginning of the universe sends out expansion energy in, let's say, speed of light. What we see of it must still affect us, just like photons from there affect our eyes. Galaxies we see that are closer to the beginning at one side and moving in another direction then straight against or straight from the middle of the universe should just like the ball in the wheel, start rotating.
Yes, no, not likely, very likely, I don't know, I have no idea.
Laterally, I'll do a "laterall" and double post. All post on the net are insane and stupid.
Sure.
PS. How fast is space expansion energy?
Could that actually be gravity, space expansion energy that hit us from "creation"? That would explain why some far away 1a stars explodes stronger far away in space and why galaxies rotate (just like a ball with a movement inside a wheel will start rotating.
PS. Awesome signature!
Forget about red shift, the energy and mass over there is like (14 bill)^2 times magnified.
What if you had a "scratch board", basically one post, and alot of user names by it, and when you click a username, his text come up. Next to every post you could have a "vote for cleaning" button.
And every guest post or thread could have a "vote for scratchboard" button.
Would you be meaning that the point of view of the observer has a higher concentration of matter that it normally would? That still doesn't make much sense, but it's at least plausible.
No, it's just that the universe didn't have a 14 bill years radius 14 bill years ago, hence what we see is stretched, and hence the light from there should be stretched too.
Have you made a draft?
Whether or not there is dough or nuts in the brain, that is the question. I would rather have an apple.
Or more energy efficient yet, some sort of simple mechanical divice, that runs a propeller, enhancing the speed of the boat.
As for realising this invention, that might get tough. I'll see when I have the money for it.
The end product wouldn't be much more expensive then a couple of bicycles though.
You can boil some water and put it in a cup, then press some citrus into it and add a teabag, which will make the water absorb the tea better. I think.
That is a correct assumption.
If the canoe was to be built, the length of the 3 parts would automatically adjust to the size of the waves. If more then 3 parts were required, this would also be adjusted, though that would be much like a transformer so perhaps one should just adjust it for the best preformance possible. I can see that the canoe could be adjusted manualy if you had lots of different parts etc.