You are not logged in.
Focusing on "ary", you could use:
8 = octary (from Latin, "octava", which in music gets written sometimes as "8va"
16 = hecktary (inspired from but NOT related to the term "hexadecimal"
32 = aviary
64 = topiary
128 = mercenary.... etc LOL
negatives would of course start with :
-2 = contrary
-4 = cemetary
-8 = (d)ocumentary (playing off the "oct" for 8 above
A fixed constant would be:
k= stationary
Ok, not funny any more, if it was at all. I had fun anyway ![]()
Wow ! Only four days after I posted this link, *POOF!* it's gone !! Counton.org is restructuring, and I don't see any of the pages that I had referred to previously. ![]()
I thought I would share this link I found ![]()
http://www.counton.org/alevel/pure/mathsdirectframe.htm
I have checking the videos out because of this link, and they are working for me. That one particular dude (younger one) cracks me up now and then. I like the videos because they cut to the chase, yet still address the formula(s) that are presented in classrooms, so you can compare their version with the original, and therefore will make better sense.
Ricky, congratulations ! All of you, including yourself, Ricky, have been inspiring to me. Way to go !
I think that if you are here for a little while, and don't get banned, you become a member.
To MathisFun or Ricky or any other Mod, am I correct?
I think if you add -16 and -2, you have -18. Then add -1, to get -19.
Ricky, to me it looks like the way it was written down may have been wrong. I say this because it looks to me like they are adding that same -1, but just trying to get the students to add the -16 and -2 first. Just a guess, but that's what it looks like to me.
¡Hola, Alyssa! No hablo mucho español, pero estoy segura que podré ayudarte un poquito.
Jane ! You are so smart ! Not just a math whiz ?? Wow, impressive ![]()
Hey, Sonic ! How are you ? Welcome to the forum !
Cool!! Pakistan!!! Is K2 there? What is your favorite mountain to climb or to look at?
I thought K2 was in the Himalayas.
Hi Eddie,
Hey, if you can give us some data to use, we may be able to give you some help. If they are three similar graphs, then data from one would be enough to help us see how to help you.
3 feet long = 36 inches, so the bathroom floor width equals:
36 inches / 2 inches per side per tile = 18 tiles wide. Put that amount aside for now, ok?
Next, the floor is 2 feet wide.
24 inches wide divided by 2 inches per side per tile = 12 tiles wide.
So for the bathroom floor we now have:
18 tiles wide and 12 tiles long. Multiply that out for your answer ![]()
No problem, you're welcome.
First problem:
Start with the 7-3, that equalling 4
Next do 2^3 = 8
So now you have:
9 + 6 x (4) x 8
Next, multiplication from left to right (don't add the 9 yet):
6 x 4 x 8 = 192
Now add your 9:
192 + 9 = 201
Follow the same processes for the next one and you can see where the 275 comes from ![]()
I get 201 for the first one, and 275 for the second.
Parentheses
Exponents
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtraction
Hi G ! Welcome ![]()
Lines of the treble (g-clef) staff on sheet music, from bottom to top:
Every good boy deserves fudge (E,G,B,D,F)
Lines of the bass (f-clef)s staff, from bottom to top:
Face (F,A,C,E)
Hi Myka-X !
I am a musician - guitar player, mostly, but I also play bass and keyboards. I'll check out your site - nice guitars !
Hello maryam, welcome to the Forum, and have fun !
Hi Rachel, welcome ! Ditto to Pravin's post, there are some extremely helpful and friendly people here. See ya here soon ![]()
Hi Mathceleb ! Welcome !
I have already checked out your site. It is pretty cool ! See ya around. ![]()
Thank you Krassi
I appreciate the help !
....anyone?
Please correct me if I am wrong..
If a curve on a graph is "cut" by a secant line (I didn't know what word to use), we could call one end of the secant point a and the other a+h, as h representing the difference in distance on the X axis of the two points.
If the line that is tangential to point a is pivoted on point a, thus decreasing the distance of a+h, this distance a+h could be termed a+h', the first derivative of a + h. Is there anything correct about this?
What I am trying to accomplish here is understanding derivatives better, and that's when I came across "e". Am I on the right track at all?
Thank you Mathsy, that helps !
To John E: Interesting link lol