You are not logged in.
Thanks! That explains a lot.
http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~anayak/co … ce103-s10/
will that help? its the first 5 bullet point we have covered so far in the Overview section.
Edit: Also if you click on the Lectures link on top, you should have access to some of the notes.
Hi bob,
I am studying modular arithmetic, diophantine equations, linear congruences, prime numbers and logic. And we are supposed to be able to prove statement concerning those topics.
for example:
prove 2^n > n^2 for all n greater than 2.
If you need more info, let me know.
Yea I get your answer bobbym but wolfram gives another representation.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=-l … esentation
I have to find the series for g(x) = -ln(1-x) using the function f(x) = 1/(1-x).
Seems simple as f(x) is just the derivative of g(x).
So I start by finding the series for 1/(1-x) =
k=0 to inf.Now I am dont know where to go from here, I can integrate the whole series but that doesnt get me the right answer.
I also tried to work the series from ln(x) to -ln(1-x) but also got stuck.
Hi,
I have a Discrete Math midterm approaching soon and I feel that I am weak at proofs, can someone provide me with some activities to do. Say give a batch of proofs to prove or disprove and then check over my solutions?
Thanks!
Your multiplication by the conjugate is wrong from step 1 to step 2.
I have given up on this for today, will look at it with a fresh mind tomo.
Yes I know but I am not sure which test would apply now...is this a geometric series? No. Can I use divergence test(n-th term test) on this? I dont think so because this is similar to the case of harmonic series combined with an alternating series(which converges even though the harmonic series diverges by itself).
With the comparision test or limit comparision test...I am not sure what to compare to, -1^n sqrt(n)?
Integral test wont work, this is not a p-series, AST, ASET, root and ratio all dont work.
Therefore by deduction LCT or Comparision Test should do it!
, I have been at this for atleast a couple of hours.
Hmm so all i have to do is show that absolute value of a(n+1) > a(n) ????
Thanks for pointing that out, but that still doesnt solve the problem. Fixed post #8
and my post above is still correct.
Ok I rearranged the expression to this:
when I take the limit:
I got stuck using Alternating Series Test(aka Leibniz Test), cant do Ratio or Root Test and currently I am trying to see what happens to the partial sums of this series.
I know what the ratio turns out to be, but I am wondering about how to show that the series diverges or converges. And how to calculate the ratio to show that.
I am not sure if thats supposed to help as wolfram says ratio test is inconclusive:
I am stuck on another series, I just have to find if its convergent or divergent.
I tried doing the Alternating Series Test(Leibniz Test) but I get upto:
lim as n--> inf
EDIT: change of sign
Oh!
I know of the trick just that the way you wrote it out the first time made it seems like each proceeding step is equal to the previous one.
Hi,
Thanks for your help bob and bobby!
bobbym: I am confused about why you multplied the sum by 1/4 and the steps onwards.
I am having trouble showing that the below series is convergent and finding its sum:
I tried rewriting the series multiple ways but am not able to something i can use. Here is one I think I may be able to use:
it said for all a,b,c in intergers prove the following:
GCD(ab,c) = GCD(a,c) * GCD(b,c)
so a counterexample proves it false since it is for all a,b,c.
It was a homework question on one of my assignments.
Wow that was that easy! thanks!
C25
Yes it does
GCD(8,1024) = 8
GCD(2,1024) = 2
GCd(4,1024) = 4
hence 8 = 4*2
I just looked it up, I am not sure how to apply it though.
i am guessing we show, a,b,c have some prime factors since all of them have the same prime factor, the statement should be true.
EDIT:
This is what i have so far:
Let a = p1 * p2 where pN is an integer and a prime.
Let b = p3 * p4 " " " """
Let c = p5* p6 " " " " "
Now i am not sure how to show that a,b,c have the same unique prime factor.
No I need help with another question and its easier to continue in this thread than create another.
Prove GCD(ab,c) = GCD(a,c) * GCD(b,c)