You are not logged in.
Too complex for the human brain to comprehend.....
wcy showed us 0 x ∞ = -1
and there seems to be no loophole in the proof.
I was almost convinced that 0 x ∞ = 0 x 1/0 = 1, now I'd have to tell my mind it is ±1.
When we take the value -1,
0 x ∞ = -1
Taking square root on both sides,
√ (0 x ∞) = √-1
0 x √ ∞ = i
Therefore, √ ∞ = -i/0 !
wcy, your theory appears to be right!
Correct, Mathsy!
Problem # n+10
Mathsyperson, Kylekatarn and wcy are a team for solving problems. The possibility of one solving a problem is 45%, the other is 50% and the third is 55%. What is the probability that a problem would be solved?
x³ + 2x² - 9x = 18
x³ + 2x² - 9x - 18 = 0
Putting x=3, we find that it is one of the solutions.
Therefore,
(x-3)(x² + 5x + 6) = 0
x² + 5x + 6 = (x+3)(x+2)
Therfore,
(x-3)(x+3)(x+2) = 0
which gives the following values of x :- 3, -3, -2
PS:_ A cubic equation, that is an equation of degree three, can be solved only by trial and error, as far as I know.
A quonset hut would be half of a right solid cylinder. Length is given as 205 feet. Width is given as 80 feet, and height 24 feet. But if the width is 80 feet, the height would have to be 25.46479 feet. That is obtained by dividing 80 by pi.
The volume would be pi*r²*h/2 = (3.141592 x 648.4556 x 205)/2
= 208,811.285 cubic feet
So the next number would be 6³+6²+6=258
Mathsy, thats very good!
Problem #n+9
From a well shuffled pack of 52 cards, four cards are drawn one after the other. What's the probability that the four of them would belong to different suits?
If the value of the current month is B and the previous month A,
[(B-A)/A]*100 is the right way of calculating the percentage increase, which you have done. Problem arises when the difference is 0 and both the values are 0. I don't think there is any mathematical solution, but if you could program in such a way that
the formula is applied only when the difference ≠ 0
and when the difference is zero, the percentage change is zero,
your problem could be solved!
You are correct, NIH !
Problem # n+8
Find the next term of the series
3, 14, 39, 84, 155, _____
Problem # n+8
Can you find two numbers composed of only ones which give the same result by addition and multiplication?
d/dx (logx) = 1/x and ∫(1/x)dx = logx
Welcome to the forum, Tahlia!
Keep visiting, new pages are being put on the website! You'd love them too!
Zach is going places! Well done ![]()
Yes, I used logarithm to the base 10 for convenience.
The idea is to show that
Infinity + 1 = Infinity
Infinity + Infinity = Infinity
Infinity x Infinity = Infinity
Infinity ^ Infinity = Infinity
Infinity ^ Infinity ^ Infinity ^ Infinity ........Infinite times = Infinity
This is true because because we can never say for what value of n
log(n)infinity would be undefined.
And this is only the fourth stage of iteration (also referred to as 'tetration').
No wonder, Infinity is beyond comprehension for the human mind!
Definition:-
log (x) is denoted as log(1)x
log (log x) is denoted as log(2) x
log[log(logx)] is denoted as log(3)x
and so on.
We know that log of zero or a negative number is not defined.
My question is, for what value of n would log(n) ∞ i.e. log(n)infinity, be not defined?
(eg. log(6)Googolplex is not defined.)
Warning : We are moving from infinite to transfinite ![]()
a = 1
b=0.0000000000000000...1
a-b=0.99999999....
a²-b²=1²-0.000000....1=0.99999999...
(a+b)(a-b)=a²-b²
a+b = (a²-b²)/(a-b)=0.9999.../0.9999...=1
a=1
therefore b=0 !!!!
therefore a-b=0.999999...=1-0=1 !!!!!
If we are talking of infinite number of zeros after the decimal, before the 1, in b,
the proof is correct!
Because, a²-b² would be equal to a-b.
This is because we have defined 0.0000000000.......1 as 1 ater an infinite number of zeros after the decimal followed by 1,
as kylekatarn denotes 0.(0)1.
However, if the number of zeros is finite, (Don't worry, it is not)
a²-b² would contain more 9s than a-b.
Mathsy, you are right.
But, this can be done with Calculus.
Let x^x = y
x logx = log y
Differentiating both side,
xLogx(1) + x(1/x) = d(logy)
logx + 1 = d(logy)
When this is equal to zero,
Logx + 1 = 0
Log x = -1
x = e^-1 = 1/e
This is because logy is minimum when y is minmum ![]()
Oops, I made a mistake.
If, as I had said earlier, x∈ Real numbers,
my question would have no answer as
(-1 x 10^n) -1 would give a negative odd number for a
large value of n (n ∈ Natural Numbers). And this number raised to itself would give a negative number which would be much lesser than zero!
Therefore, the smallest value would be -∞
I forgot while posting that one that a^-n = 1/a^n
Therefore, the minmum value of x^x is not -∞
I am sorry I wasn't concentrating 100% ![]()
You are right, MathsisFun. I am working on this. I shall give you the details next week.
0^0^0 is not defined.
But for 1, as you pointed out, 2^Mx > x^x^x.
For this problem, let us take value of x ≥ 2, x ∈ N
Am I allowed to slightly modify my question?
If yes, the question should read
'For what value of x is x^x the minimum, x>0?'
If, as I had said earlier, x∈ Real numbers,
my question would have no answer as
(-1 x 10^n) -1 would give a negative odd number for a
large value of n (n ∈ Natural Numbers). And this number raised to itself would give a negative number which would be much lesser than zero!
Therefore, the smallest value would be -∞ ![]()
I don't know if the way I represent the infinitesimal quantity ( 0.(0)1 ) is mathematically correct. But I found it very usefull while researching on this.
0.(0)1 is 1/(10^ ∞)
When I had to deal with numbers like 9.9999999999999999999....8,
I put a horizontal arrow pointing towards the right above the 9 after the decimal.Then I put the number 8. This meant that 9 keeps on recurring but the last digit is 8. But your method seems better, more convenient. Whether it would be accepted by Mathematicians worldover is another thing!
But the point I wanted to make is 0.999999999999...................... is a devilish number and would never be found in any mathematical problem or solution. It cannot be represented in a graph, It cannot be said to be irrational, yet it cannot be expressed as a rational number. It is not a transcendental number. As a rule, it should be possible to represent all decimals as a rational number. But this number defies the rule, although it is a recurring decimal. Sin 89.99999999999999999999999999999........ degrees can be said to be equal to this number.
I give up..........
If Mx is the Least Common Multiple of all numbers from 1 to x,
can it be proved that
x^x < 2^Mx < x^x^x ?
The second part is very simple. 2^Mx is certainly less than x^x^x because both the base and the exponent of 2^Mx are lesser than x^x^x.
Problem # n+7
If x ∈ Real Numbers, What is the minimum value of x^x?
A poll like...
Which part of Mathematics I hate the most?
(a) Calculus
(b) Trignometry
(c) Probability
(d) Algebra
(e) Vectors and Mechanics
(f) Number Theory
.........etc. ![]()
Reminded me of one of Murphy's Love Laws:-
Brains x Beauty x Availability = Constant ![]()
A stranger offered me a bottle of coke. Coke has always been my favorite. How could I resist? Without any suspicion, I drank the entire 300 ml. Later, I started feeling dizzy and I realized I was poisoned. But it was too late. My legs were too weak to carry me and I fell dead.