You are not logged in.
Trying a new "Introduction to Derivatives": Introduction to Derivatives
(To replace this one: Introduction to Derivatives)
(Note: the next step will be a page describing how to use the rules like power rule, chain rule etc)
What do you think of the new one? Have I gone too far in simplifying? Any suggestions?
Smooth function would need a page of its own, I think.
Thanks Calligar. Questioning is an important part of mathematics.
Nice extra example bobby.
And that 0/0 thing ... it is like asking "how many 0s in 0?". Are there no zeros in zero, or perhaps just the one? See: Dividing by Zero
Yes, this gets me every time, too. It is just so natural to simplify, how can it be wrong?
It remind me of the 2=1 proof:
Let a=b
a² = ab
a²-b² = ab-b²
(a-b)(a+b) = b(a-b)
a+b=b
1+1=1
2=1
The error is when we simplify by dividing by (a-b)=0
Be that as it may, I can choose a less controversial example.
New page: Continuous Functions
Let me know if you find any errors, or think of some way to improve it.
What happened to my last response, I intentionally hid it, tested it last time and it worked. How did my button disappear?
I "un-buttoned" it ... because it misbehaved for me.
I adapted the LCM calculator as a GCF calculator!
Here: Greatest Common Factor Calculator
Have a play, tell me what works/doesn't work.
The LCM calculator is a Flash App that uses my "full precision" library
But the GCF calculator is a fairly simple javascript program ... I could re-make it in Flash.
Thanks noelevans, well argued and well said.
It might be interesting to have different rules. For example: add the numbers above, left and diagonal-above-left.
1 1 1 1
1 3 5 7
1 5 13 25
Thanks guys
I could reject the "-" sign.
I edited a file or two in some special way. Can't remember which or how. Hopefully some research will help.
New page: Quadratic Equations in the Real World
How is it?
New version (0.6): Least Common Multiple Calculator
I upgraded it to use my "Full Precision" functions, so it can handle larger numbers, so lots of changes to internal calcs.
Again, could you throw some numbers at it?
Nice videos.
Which is best do you think (and why?)?
While I have you- could you maybe add buttons for the hide and url tags on the Post Reply page any time soon?
If I can figure out how to do it!
Wow, cool choices!
Thanks anonimnystefy!
Calligar: your opinion is not too late (I will continue listening to feedback) and is very interesting, thank you.
Just for fun (ignoring the million dollar fees!), who would you like as a presenter? What about Morgan Freeman, Sean Connery, Seth Green (he does Chris Griffin on Family Guy) or anyone else?
It is a java app (I didn't write it), so maybe something inside the java code is misbehaving?
Thanks noelevans, both for the thoughtful feedback and the nice words.
It seems that "S" and "E" are both preferred. At this stage I will be getting the people who made the "S" video to make more, but modified according to feedback.
So far I have:
* Animations are good, but should not be distracting like the "V" video
* Slow down a little (probably simplest to add a few seconds pause after a key point, or calculation)
* For me I like having music, but perhaps at a lower volume.
* Presenter should have a clearer voice (necessarily female?)
* E has the best number line
* E has the best three-number explanation
Great ideas guys ... I will try some of them and see how they look.
Well, that is some good encouragement!