You are not logged in.
Hi Bobby,
I spotted an error on MAlpha. After clicking "More digits" in their "Result" window the "10" disappears from the exponent reference at the end of the "Copyable plaintext" output. Not always...maybe only after a couple of clicks on "More digits", or maybe after the last-available click on it.
I've emailed them about it.
384...xlnt!
I've shaved some moves from mine, too! Down by 22 to 413 (L5 & L6). Nice to reduce L6's cricket score...but not down to yours yet.
Haven't looked at your paths...don't want to spoil the fun or challenge of trying to work it out myself.
I've updated our scores in my previous post.
Btw, Jane, I feel rather mean about this thread taking over from yours...especially after seeing your lonely post there re your good L3 score. Pity we can't splice threads.
Hi Jane,
I hadn't seen that old thread. You've posted some good scores there, too.
I'm not sure whether to continue here or there...I'll stay here, I think, because more people have contributed to this thread.
From your thread...
Ill be interested to know whether any level can be completed in fewer moves than I did.
Our score comparison:
You Me
L1 12 12
L2 53 53
L3 27 23
L4 39 31
L5 44 51
L6 44 71
L7 19 19
L8 41 57
L9 47 42
L10 62 76
388 435
We're the same on three levels. You have the lower score on four of them and my score is lower on three. Our combined lowest scores total 371. Looks like on three of the levels I was aiming to get the record worst score!
I'll have a look at the ones where you're lower to learn from your strategy, and for my better scores I'll try to remember my moves and post them. In fact, I should probably do as you did and post my moves for the lot for comparison.
Might have to wait until after the Winter Olympics before I can do that, though...and Bobby keeps me busy.
Hi Bobby,
That is extremely close.
Yes, I should have shown fractions. I was going to but didn't think to use improper fractions, and as MIF only provides the "½" fraction symbol I opted to display my answer with the recurring digits after the decimal point. I could've tried LaTeX, but this was easier and I didn't realise the two modes gave different results.
WolframAlpha's "decimal approximation" of the fractional input is exactly the same as the one given by my calculator for which I used decimal input...up to WolframAlpha's maximum output of 3705 digits. Maybe it can display more digits, but I didn't know how to get it to do that (my calculator displays up to 5012 digits).
I wonder what the actual difference is between the correct answer and the approximations given by both WolframAlpha and my calculator.
I used Excel to solve both parts: spreadsheet for 'b' and Solver for 'a'.
Btw, your 'hidden text' label shows "b" instead of "a".
Hi Bobby,
So, you took that speed typing course.
Nothing to do with typing speed...
I am also impressed with how quickly you pick things up.
...with my free hand I was able to pick up the cup of tea that I knocked off the desk just as it hit the floor - all without spilling a drop.
Btw, I don't know how you would have known about my exceptionally-quick manual dexterity.
Hi Bobby,
I saw that link a couple of days ago and tried out the exercises. Interesting, but all much too advanced for me to try to get a handle on. It would take me a lifetime to begin to understand even just some of it.
Hi cberry,
After getting nowhere with trying to find a solution to your problem I googled it and found .
Hi Bobby,
If a + b + c = 50
What is the maximum value of a^4*b^5*c^6
Hi Bobby,
I am also impressed with how quickly you pick things up.
What you may not be aware of is that during the 16 minutes and 50 seconds that it took me to reply to your post I made and drank a hot cup of tea even before reading what you wrote. I also typed my post one-handed with one finger, as it was early morning here and my other hand was fast asleep. So was most of the rest of me...except for my brain, which was barely ticking along on autopilot just pre-bedtime.
Thanks, Bobby...I'd overlooked that. I've changed the code and output in my previous post.
Little touches like that of mathsyperson's I like a lot! But I usually miss thinking of them myself.
Hi Bobby,
The 'digital root' option didn't work out, and so I've deleted reference to it.
But you didn't have to check further than 0 to 8 because of the mod 9 aspect of this problem.
Oh, yes...I see. I hadn't understood that point until now.
I think is much the same as mathsyperson's.
I had to remove negative test numbers from my original program because I was getting incorrect mod results (eg, that -14 mod 9 = -5, instead of 4); and I didn't know how to fix that without too much messing around that I shouldn't have to do. Excel did it correctly (answer 4...same as WolframAlpha).
My output table of solutions and their remainders made it easy to analyse and work out the formula that I mentioned earlier. Testing x,y = 0 to 100 made the pattern obvious.
Sleep well. No rush...I'm off to work now. Maybe when I get back home I'll check out that 'digital root' option some more.
Btw, the formula I gave in post #21 was simply derived from observations that I made from a list of results produced with x,y values ranging from -100 to 100 for each variable.
I used BASIC to find x,y answers within that range that satisfied ZHero's "X*Y is congruent to X+Y mod 9" problem and then printed the list.
I hope I understand this problem correctly. Anyway, here's what I've found:
Solutions occur when (x+y) mod 9 is either 4 or zero.
I did it in and also in .
They were the easy ways for me.
We had that first one before, didn't we?
Yes, we did...in these two threads:
soroban's "Making a necklace".
wintersolstice's "Chain Puzzles".
Hi Bobby,
Is that way clearer for you?
The two ways are equally clear to me. For problems that lend themselves to that approach I prefer to go that way because I use my scientific calculator a lot and like to try to find concise methods to suit calculator entry if possible.
Hi Bobby,
Following your clear explanation of your solution to the race problem here's my attempt at explaining the equation in my last post:
Made a meal of that one! Your answer explains it well.
The phrasing is a little weird on this problem.
Yes, I thought it was odd, ambiguous or something...
...which is why I gave 2 answers.
How did they do?
Hi Bobby,
The runners all ran at the same speed.
If they all ran at the same speed as each other for the whole race, then
If they each maintained their own speed for the whole race then
Hi,
I think it might be this one, that's called "Wonders Of Nature" and features a magnificent rock standing up out of the water.
I enjoyed doing it...nice puzzle (easy controls), and nice scene!
Hi John,
I use SnagIt for video captures...and also for general screen captures. There are many such programs available - some freeware - and I've tried several. SnagIt suits me best and has many features that I like (eg, captures scrolling windows; good annotation tools). It costs, but it's very reliable and I enjoy using it - which is quite often.
That game is clever, I can't do it, tried.
Yes, it's very cleverly done! Some diamonds are tricky to get, and you can even get stuck with no escape (other than by pressing "Ctrl").
Once you get the hang of it you'll find that the 1024-move limit is quite generous.
My fewest moves:
Level 1: 12
Level 2: 53
Level 3: 23
Level 4: 31
Level 5: 51
Level 6: 71
Level 7: 19
Level 8: 57
Level 9: 42
Level 10: 76
Total: 435
Hi Bobby,
DINAH SHORE's