You are not logged in.
And will the polars bear if there are no bears on the polars XD
Or better:
Will the north pole bear if there is no bear on the north pole?
I just sensured that, I figure the joke was mediocre...
If you cry in water does it flood?
East coast... also rhimes with Jeast Goast and Lease Coat -Mind you, both can rise.
Why would something spooky happen though, if I may ask?
But surely the quantum entanglement that also has an entropy, couldn't possibly deliver that entropy any longer then the photon that carries the quantum entanglement, and how far could that photon even come?
Yeah. Can an entanglement or the shard itself move that far to begin with?
Yeah. Poor mice though. Allthough perhaps the toys could sweat some sorta mousetasting toothpaste that they like?
Seriously (good idea and all) that could prolong the cats lifes quite a bit!
basically one only need to know the average distance a quantumentanglement moves and the procentage that moves that far. I guess.
Then some sorta probability calcule.
Probably, one can measure the change in star light intensity over time and come up with the calcule. Allthough I am less skilled in this.
Let's figure out how far away it is on a sidenote though.
1. It could've been the supernova we saw 1987. (high distribution of light etc.)
That does sound sensible, allthough probably very far away, leaving no dangers too us.
Easy to say, if we just had some figures... Imagine that the nearest star except the sun shines with a light that is proportional with 1/r^2 and solar emition, yet only x% of that reaches us. It is safe to say that over the black holes lifetime, an object y times further away has emitted solar energy with the small change of also passing a black hole while the twin escapes. let's say 30% escapes, but we don't see any black holes near suns nearby, so let's guess that the black hole is at a big radius from the star in question. A lonely black hole in space. and the energy in free space around a black hole is 3-4 kelvin perhaps? Doesn't sound far, yet I wouldn't know, quite.
I would explain it with some sorta entropy photon (I've heard of it). Allthough... perhaps if a photon is a pulse wave, maybe an entropy photon could be explained as more of a longitudal wave? Like a distortion in time space?
Wait, new invention! an animal chew toy that has toothbrush abillities for pets. Example: a toy mouse with toothbrush fur for cats!!!
I reccon it has a high truthvalue though. The question is only: how do we explain it with logic?
Quite alot of photons in space though. I bet a quantum entanglement can get pretty far... In the speed of light.
Thank you bobbym, It was the best! I got many presents, merry cristmass bobbym and soon happy new year!
Basically I believe:
1. The black hole is some kind of substance that when confronted with matter, timelessly converts it into it's own kind of matter. Other then that I believe that in a quantum entanglement, that sorta matter can dissapear from the black hole.
2. Any entanglement that leaves the black hole has still a spin with speed, however in the black hole, its time and length is still zero. A small shard of the black holes baneless matter left it with the entanglement. In some way, the entanglement energy is released outside the black hole, whether the entanglement can go away if one particle is in the black hole is a hard question to answer. basically, as long as time and length is nothing, the speed can be anything, thus the energy is released as soon as the entanglement has re-entangled.
3. I would need your help once again bobbym, I need you to calculate the odds of an entanglement to reach us from any known black hole, sizeably big. I am certain that there is one here, and I have a hard time believing that it's all that far away.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/08/050814164431.htm
My argument is:
Ofcourse the state of timelessness comes before or at the same time as total virtual particle quantum entanglement transmission, thus there would still be a trace in 'Alice', no matter how small.
Even if some believe it can't happen, imagine that it did.
Thoughts:
Even if length is contracted and time is dilated to zero, the speed goes on somehow, for instance in a spin, for instance in an entanglement.
So the outside entanglement has a constant spin, just like when one cast a const in programing. So naturally, any particle that meets the const entangled one, gets opposit spin, allthough they can never lose their opposite spin either. so basically a such a particle infects the hole world with constant entanglements. All of this because the first entanglements time has stopped so that it can never be lost. It's like a flood wave, allthough quantum physically. Like an unharmfull one. Or would it be?
Look on this wrong conclusion about virtual particles!
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/08/050814164431.htm
Ofcourse the state of timelessness comes before or at the same time as total virtual particle quantum entanglement transmission, thus there would still be a trace, no matter how small.
Wow, NY. That's hi tech man! Snow you say... Better be artificial!
I'm very comfortable here, and snow is fab, the shoveling is not groovy enough though.
How hot in florida now?
In winter it snows, but why not instead of salting the paths pull the snow with vacuum into a heat preserving punctured hoose with salt and/or heatcord in it, or just blow the snow of the path with a general hoose with holes in it.
Really? Wow, you could do that?
no, how many bounces until it has left my body
well I get 14 mole and how many times does photons bounce before they leave me you think?
I guess that depends on how well you can see right through me?
Probably, allthough I wonder how many photon bounces I get if n*612*10^12*h = 30*120000 and n is the number of photons...
h is plancks constant, mind you!
h = 6,6261·10−34 Js
n = 8877549299250646063650253 photons
oh, sorry, that's the temperature newton. buggars.
okay, 30 celcius is 10 newton, what gives?