You are not logged in.
Things are going well for me.
Some years ago I built a sundial in the back garden but the post had gradually sunk into the soil, but unevenly, so the clock face was no longer horizontal. I took a major decision to lift it and reset it in post cement. But I lost the orientation on the pole star so last night I was out back at midnight finalising the adjustment.
I built it with two circular dials. The top one is fixed and points along the polar axis. The lower one can be rotated. Half the circle has the hour angles for GMT (6am to 6pm with 12noon in the middle) and the other for BST (7am to 7pm with 1pm in the middle). That way I can change it around when we switch to 'summer time' and back for the winter. I have a graph for the equation of time with longitude correction included which yields a small angle correction so a fine adjustment can be made to the clock face to get a really accurate time throughout the year.
Bob
hi Frank smith
Welcome to the forum.
It's a good question.
If you look here: https://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/cir … ctors.html
you'll see a way to establish the formula by dividing a circle into sectors and letting the number of sectors become infinite.
But there's still a question because this method uses the formula for the circumference, so is there a proof for this too?
I cannot find one on the MIF site; I'm sure you could 'google' it.
I've got a method that works out the perimeter of a regular polygon and lets the number of sides tend to infinity so the polygon becomes a circle.
It uses sin(x) tends to x as x tends to zero (x in radians). There a justification* for that here:
https://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/radians.html
* The method I learnt at school uses the formula for circumference so it isn't suitable here as it creates a circular argument (no pun intended).
Bob
hi Agnishom,
Great to hear from you again.
F WETC DX WEUFQTE EH E HCSDZFUJ TCIFSC. F SEO DHC 'RCZ' YRCO F YEOU UP NCCX WJ ZCEQ TCUEFQH HCSZCU.
Bob
You would need to know what 'h' represents. 140 < h ≤ 150 implies h can have any value above 140 with an inclusive upper bound of 150. So h could be 140.000000000001
If you draw a number line with those endpoints, 145 is half way along (and having one excluded endpoint and one included does not alter that).
If only the numbers {141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150} are under consideration such as "What is the median of these ten numbers: 141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150" then 145.5 is correct.
So median and middle number may not be the same thing.
Bob
?? It's the condition, so what more are you expecting? Did you want the single solution too? It wasn't asked for was it?
Bob
Bob
When I was at school we did tricky multiplications and divisions using log tables so we learnt it earlier than that ie O level stage. Nowadays it's probably AS.
I can show you the underlying theory if you wish.
Bob
Yes if you use logs.
You can have logs in base 10 or the natural log base (e) but both logs have to use the same.
Bob
Using 1.08 I calculated n as 3.99999999 in Excel so that seems ok.
Why do we equate the two values of x?
Actually I put the two ys equal and solved for x. But I could have eliminated the xs and solved for y. That would have worked as well.
If the lines cross then, at the intersection point they both have the same x and y coordinates. You have two equations so it becomes a simultaneous equations problem. What are the values of x and y that fit both equations simultaneously. So eliminate one unknown and solve for the other. As both equations are in the form y = function of x, the quickest way to an answer is to make the two functions of x equal and find the one x that works for both. Once you have that you can substitite that x value into either equation to get y. It works whichever equation you choose because that y is the one that fits in both equations.
Many routes to the same answer:
y = 2x -2
y = x/2 -1/2
Subtract the left hand sides and the right hand sides:
0 = 3x/2 - 3/2 so 3x/2 = 3/2 so x=1
substitute in y = 2x -2 ..... y = 2times 1 -2 = 0
substitute in y = x/2 -1/2 ...... y = 1/2 - 1/2 = 0
Make x the subject of each:
x = (y+2)/2
x = 2(y+1/2)
Set these equal
Substitiute in y = 2x - 2 ....... 0 = 2x - 2 ....... x = 1
Substitite in y = x/2 - 1/2 ....... 0 = x/2 - 1/2 ........ x/2 = 1/2 ....... x = 1
Bob
Equating those values of y gives
In general
Bob
It's all in the name. HCF is highest common factor. The common factors must be in the intersection because that's what the intersection means. We want the highest so multiply them together.
Splitting the factors into their primes components helps us to identify the common ones. You could put {1,2,3,6,7,14,21,42} all in one circle and {1,2,4,7,8,14,28,56} in the other, and then you could spot that 14 is the highest in both sets but it's a lot more work.
Bob
To make a Venn diagram, draw one circle for each number. Put the prime factors inside the circles so that common primes are in the intersecting part of the diagram.
The union gives the LCM.
Bob
The coordinates of two points before and after the enlargement is enough. Let's say they are (x1,y1) and (x2,y2) in the first shape and (X1,Y1) and (X2,Y2) in the transformed shape.
Find the equation of the line joining (x1,y1) to (X1,Y1) and also the other similar line. These are the rays but expressed algebraically.
Find where they cross. that's the centre.
You could probably construct a formula for this and then you're independent of a graph entirely.
Bob
If the centre is C and A = (x1,y1) and B = (X1,Y1) then CB/CA gives the scale factor.
I think it's odd that the question refers to small bars and large bars. Does that mean there are two sizes of bar? I think the question just means bars that are put in small packs and same size bars that are piut in large packs. Altogether a very badly worded and thought out question. It would be easy to change the numbers a bit so that only whole packs are sold and still test the same skills.
Bob
Starting with the hexagon divided into 6 equilateral triangles.
Let side = a and apothem = h. Note this is the height of a triangle.
Area of a triangle = half base times height = 0.5 ah.
So area of hexagon = 6 times 0.5 ah = 3ah. But perimenter = P = 6a so area = 0.5 times 6ah = 0.5 hP.
Using Pythag on a half triangle h = √ [a^2 - (0.5a)^2] = √3 a/2
so area = 3ah = 3a .√3.a/2 = 3√3 a^2 /2.
Bob
My working is a little different but comes to the same answer, 50 small bars leading to 12.5 packs. you can get the answer even though the answer makes no sense. I've re-checked this several ways and still get to the same conclusion.
Odd
Bob
The grower bags up the pots and weighs them. He puts the rounded down amount on the bag so no customer can complain they are being undersold.
Bob
You're talking about a regular hexagon I think; so the answer is yes. You can divide the hexagon into 6 equilateral triangles each with side = the same as for the hexagon itself. Let's say side = a. Then perimeter = 6a and diagonal = 2a.
Bob
Correct!
Bob
5x= 6 means x = 1.2
An equation that gives rise to a line is why the word linear is used.
It's the absence of any powers eg x^2 that allows this to happen.
This usage has spilt over into equations generally so in your examples linear is used because there's no powers .
Bob
hi paulb203
It looked to me like this should be 'provable' using algebra but I've come unstuck with it. I don't think I'm properly following what you're suggesting.
If a square has side 'a' then the 'diameter' = a and so the 'radius' = a/2 and the perimeter = 4a
sqi = the ratio of the ‘diameter’ of the square to the square’s ‘circumference’
So the ratio of diameter/circumference = a/4a = 1/4. Ah! Think I've just spotted what to do.
Ratio of circumference/diameter = 4
Then 'area' = 4 x (a/2)^2 = 4 (a^2)/4 = a^2
Bob
Can all linear equations be rearranged to the gradient-intercept form?
Yes. Just make y the subject of the equation. If you're not sure how to do that here's a step by step.
1) Multiply out all brackets and multiply by the lowest common denominator to eliminate any fractions.
2) Move terms about so that all the y containing terms are on the left and everything else is on the right.
3) If there's more than one y term, factorise it out so you have y(......) on the left.
4) Divide by the bracket from the line above so that y is on its own.
eg.
2x/3 + 4(x+y) = x - y + 5
1) clear that bracket and times all by 3
2x + 12x + 12y = 3x - 3y + 15
2) move terms
12y + 3y = 3x - 12x - 2x + 15
3) factorise the y. In this case we can do a lot of simplifying as well.
y(12+ 3) = 15y = -11x + 15
4) y = -11x/15 + 1
Bob
check put x = 15 in the final line so y = -11 + 1 = -10
Substitute these values into what we had at the beginning. If it works then I've probably not made an error.
LHS = 10 + 4 times (15-10) = 10 + 4 times 5 = 30
RHS = 15 --10 +5 = 15 + 10 + 5 = 30
This method of checking can be very useful. The rules of algebra are the same as the rules for numbers so if you choose some numbers to fit an equation at one stage in the working, those same numbers should 'fit' at every line in the working. If they don't you've found an error with your working.
I got that too, at first. Then I re-read the question!
outside diameter=8m and inside diameter=6m.
The area formula needs the radius not the diameter. So you have to half the numbers given. Here's another way to think about it.
Take that 8m circle. You could box it in with a 8m by 8m square and that would have an area of 8x8 = 64. So the answer must be a lot less than that.
Bob
The forumula for the area of a circle, radius r is
We are told diameters so we need to divide by 2 to get the right radius. ie 4 and 3
If a ring is a circle with a hole in it you can get the area of the ring by calculating the area of the big circle and subtracting the area of the inside hole.
You're told to take pi as 22/7 which suggests to me there's a simplification in the working involving cancelling that 7. Let's see:
pi is a common factor so you can do the subtraction and times the answer by pi
Bob
ps. This example uses substitution into a formula, factorising and cancelling fractions. Would you like some easier examples of any of these?
hi Dombo,
Welcome to the forum.
If you need help then you're at the right place.
What's the problem?
Bob