You are not logged in.
So...
So...
So I guess this is the perfect time to ask. May I please be a Real Member? Please?
My favorite bands are Matchbox 20 (is this their real name?) and Green Day. My favorite singers are Jason Blunt, John Mayers, and Jack Johnson.
Hold on: I'm not a Real Member yet, so I can't PM.
Was he a president?
OK, looks like my division by hand isn't reliable. The ratio is 2.6180738... when I used the values MathsIsFun used in his drawing.
It's very close to the Golden Ratio +1. I wonder if the two are connected to each other somehow. This will be an interesting project to dust off after 2 years.
Yeah, that's what I meant. Sorry if it was unclear.
So will I. But how do you play?
I was told that it was a complex integral. So what's a complex integral?
One cool thing that branches from this is the fact that y=sin(x)+x and y=x intersect at pπ/2 where p is the number of times it happened.
For m, treat the line like the x-axis.
I guess this makes sense.
If you can't get to the million digits, try index314.html at the end.
Virtually everything is more user friendly on the Mac.
That's interesting. Our Mac OSX filled up WAY too fast on memory and now has taken over our house's network. I cannot do anything unless "the Mac is willing."
There are 3 kinds of people: those who can count and those who can't.
a=b
a^2=ab
(a^2)-(b^2)=ab-(b^2)
(a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b)
a+b=b
b+b=b (substitution from equation 1)
1+1=1
2=1!!!
1)What else does pi equal?
2).33...
Also:
1-.9=.1
1-.99=.01
1-.999=.001
limit as x goes to infinity (1-x(.1+.01+.001+.0001...))=0
limit as x goes to infinity (x(.1+.01+.001+.0001...))=1
SO THE LIMIT OF .99999... IS 1
Q.E.D.
I think I know where Anthony is coming from. Infinity is kind of a hard concept for everyone (well... me for sure. It sure took me a while for me to figure it out).
I know how this works.
Someone's probably put this down somewhere, but here's something cool I found about graphing trigonometric waves.
SINE:
Shall we assume that this is not 3-dimentional matter, but a 2-dimentional plane segment? Therefore, the limit of the percentage of the paper consumed by the hole (no zigzaggedy lines) is 100%. But it cannot be 100%. Unless you warp the quantum mechanical stuffage. Any tips?
Here are some really cool functions you can do on the graphing calculator here: http://www.mathsisfun.com/graph/function-grapher.php (Note that the variable needs to be x, and for the Polar sub-list, the "Polar" button needs to be hit.)
Cartesian (normal):
sin(x^(cos(x)+x))
x^(cos(x)) (If you zoom out, you may see a pattern develop.)
acos(sin(3x-sqrt(ex^2)+1))
Polar (hit "Polar"):
sin(x^(cos(x)+x)) (You may need to click on "Zoom In 2x" a few times to really see how cool this one is.)
floor(x^3)
x^(cos(x))
atan(x)
acos(sin(3x-sqrt(ex^2)+1))
Can anyone add more? Please?
Is there anything wrong with this proof?
1/9=.111...
2/9=.222...
3/9=.333...
4/9=.444...
5/9=.555...
6/9=.666...
7/9=.777...
8/9=.888...
9/9=.999...
See the pattern? x/9=x((1/10)+(1/100)+(1/1000)+...). 9/9=1, because x/x=1, but 9/9, as I show above, is .999... Therefore, using substitution, I can conclude that .999...=1.
Is there a flaw? I think so...:/
Of course, we're hoping that the jackpot is over how much you paid for it. It would be just a waste of money to do it when the jackpot is under 13 million.
Also, on post #3, I heard that if two or more people win the lottery, the jackpot is split between the people who won. Could you have 2 lottery tickets be the same and then not have the winning lottery ticket if you only bought the bare minimum to win?