You are not logged in.
Thankyou mathsy!
The perpendicular line would be:
y = 3/2 x + 1
2y = 3x + 2
What is the equation used to get to this number?
I've completed a few of these with no problem but I am stuck on:
2x + 3y + 2 = 0, find the equation of the perpendicular line passing through (4, 7).
2x + 3y + 2 = 0
3y = -2x - 2
y = (-2x -2)/3
perpendicular line would be :
y = 3/2 x + 4 1/3?
I wanted sarah to answer the question krassi
What are the answers sarah? I don't.
Brilliant, thanks.
Out of curiosity. Is there any reason why they've chosen to write the answer in the form
3x + 2y = 0
instead of their usual
y = ...
I think I've been ignoring the - on the gradient and am visualising a reflection of the line.
The book is often wrong, will you be my A level tutor instead?
To clarify:
"Find the equation for the line parallel to 3x + 2y - 6 = 0 passing through (2, -3)."
so firstly we get the equation of the line we already have in the form y = mx + c:
3x + 2y - 6 = 0
3x + 2y = 6
2y = -3x + 6
y = (-3x+6)/2
y = -1.5x + 3
I'm not sure of the standard formula for the next step but I can work it out in my head by visualising it (since we are only using small and whole numbers). With a gradient of 1.5 that means for every 3 we move up we move 2 along, thus passing the point (2, -3) this line would cross the y axis at -6. Hence the equation for the second line;
y= -1.5x - 6
yet the book tells me : 3x + 2y = 0 (with y on it's own: y = -(3/2)x)
I did indeed get to that but the gradient is supposed to be an integer (whole number).
I have to then work out the equation of the line passing through (2, -3), parralel to y = 3/2x + 3 I work this out as y = 3/2x - 6. The book tells me that the answer is 3x + 2y = 0.
What is the | for? Is it a mathematical symbol?
I've figured out how to do this just fine but I have one small problem.
I have problems turning x + y + z = 0 into y = mx + c, i.e:
3x + 2y - 6 = 0
3x + 2y = 6
2y = -3x + 6
y = (-3x+6)/2
I think my problem lies here somwhere.
3x + 2y = 16
3x + y = 8
y = 8 - 3x
My mistake was, I was always trying to take 3x over first.
What is the first step for the following simultaneous equation:
2x - 3y = 2
3x + 2y = 16
Do we always use the method of multiplying one of the equations so that two of the variables match in value? Unless the coeffiecient of one of the variables is 1?
>.<
I was just working it out as I went along, I've only been studying maths for 6 weeks or so
*slaps himself*
Ah thankyou, I did not know of this method of making a pair of variables match.
4x + 3y = 19
4x - 10y = 6
surely
0x + (3y - 10y) = 13
-7y = 13 and not 13y = 13 as you suggest. Your answer is indeed correct but I'm not quite sure how you got this part.
I know the basics of solving these, but I can't seem to get the following one right:
4x + 3y = 19
2x - 5y = 3
I've tried getting each of the letters on their own and putting it back into the equations but for each, I end up with a fractional answer. The answers in the back of the book say they should be whole numbers!
is that 244,140,625 marbles or colour combinations? I don't think I took repeats into account
I've been using the quadratic formula to solve equations on which I first complete the square. I notice you are using the same formula here but without the sqrt?
you could have 12 marbles of all the same colour
12
or 2 colours, 11 of 1 colour and 1 of the other, 10 of 1 colour and 2 of the other..
11 : 1
10 : 2
9 : 3
8 : 4
7 : 5
6 : 6
5 : 7
4 : 8
3 : 9
2 : 10
1 : 11
Now we move on to 3 colours
10 : 1 : 1
9 : 1 : 2
9 : 2 : 1
8 : 1 : 3
8 : 3 : 1
7 : 1 : 4
7 : 4 : 1
6 : 1 : 5
6 : 5 : 1
5 : 1 : 6
5 : 6 : 1
4 : 7 : 1
4 : 1 : 7
3 : 1 : 8
3 : 8 : 1
2 : 9 : 1
2 : 1 : 9
1 : 1 : 10
1 : 10 : 1
4 colours...
9 : 1 : 1 : 1
8 : 1 : 1 : 2
8 : 1 : 2 : 1
8 : 2 : 1 : 1
7 : 1 : 1 : 3
7 : 1 : 3 : 1
7 : 3 : 1 : 1
6 : 1 : 1 : 4
6 : 1 : 4 : 1
6 : 4 : 1 : 1
5 : 1 : 1 : 5
5 : 1 : 5 : 1
5 : 5 : 1 : 1
4 : 1 : 1 : 6
4 : 1 : 6 : 1
4 : 6 : 1 : 1
3 : 1 : 1 : 7
3 : 1 : 7 : 1
3 : 7 : 1 : 1
2 : 1 : 1 : 8
2 : 1 : 8 : 1
2 : 8 : 1 : 1
1 : 1 : 1 : 9
1 : 1 : 9 : 1
1 : 9 : 1 : 1
We could continue in this way but if we look, we can see that with just one colour we have just the one combination, two colours has 12 combinations, three has 19 combinations and if we counted the rest we would see a pattern emerge. From this we can say that;
n = (c - 1) * (12 - c) + 1
where c is the number of different colours and n is the number of combinations. Thus;
if we have just one colour
n = (1 - 1) * (12 - 1) + 1
n = 0 * 11 + 1
n = 1
two colours
n = (2 - 1) * (12 - 1) + 1
n = 1 * 11 + 1
n = 12
three colours
n = (3 - 1) * (12 - 3) + 1
n = 19
four colours
n = (4 - 1) * (12 - 4) + 1
n = 25
Wow thanks, I'll make my answer a little more specific next time.
Again, Thanks
I know the answer was right, I looked it up
My question (which I realise is not that clear) was, "How do I work it out?"
I'm given the function f(x)=-(x-2)^2+9 and asked for the maximum value (9) and to sketch the graph of y=f(x) showing where the curve crosses the axis. I'm not sure of the standard way to work backwards but I worked back to y = -x^2 + 4x + 5 and tried to factorise it to get the points where it crosses the x-axis.
Factorising gives me -(x-5)(x-1) [[crosses at (5,0) and (1,0)]] which ofc does not fit in with the sketch. I'm begining to think that maybe I should factorise down to numercial order thus -(x-1)(x-5) and since the first bracket is preceeded by a - the sign change is canceled out giving (-1,0)(5,0)?
Maybe if someone could post the standard rule to work this out, it would be tres handy
Okay, maybe I should not take the 2 from the x^2 and instead have;
-[2x^2 + 3x - 2].
I think this will work but I have to go out now, thanks anyway