You are not logged in.
Let us get down to basics:
An integral is nothing but a sum of too many products
Great Post
Bayesian Theorem
This kind of problems is created only in real number theory.
P(T1 | B2) = (8 choose 1)/(10 choose 2), as there are (8 choose 1) ways to select the remaining non-defective component.
--Mistake here
--Just Check out HyperGeometric Distribution
Jane has already stopped discussing serious topics.
This is where the R guru go.
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/R-help-f789696.html
You can also sign up for the R-help mailing list which is basically the
same as the archive above, in real time
You can also ask R-related questions on stackoverflow
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/r
This is the best Chinese R website so far.
cos.name
This problem implicitly treats 34 and 43 the same.
It is really a hard question on maps. Better get the answer sheet.
S=t*(v0+vt)/2=t*(v0+v0+a*t)/2=v0*t+a*t*t/2
It is a pity that there are few books explaining useful distributions.
Yes, it is a typical hypergeometric problem.
For more teachings on probability distributions,
I would recommend this book
Models for Probability and Statistical Inference: Theory and Applications
by James H. Stapleton
y=x*ln(x) x>0
exp(y)=exp(ln(x)*x)=x^x
If you mean changing the probability from univariate to bivarite like U=X*Y, where X and Y are i.i.d variables. The marginal density for each is still the original density of X.
Well it is the accelaration with respect to x and x only.
A good one
I guess you should take primary manipulation both horizontally and vertically until you reduce it to simple I matrix, that is
A=P[sub]n[/sub]...P[sub]3[/sub]P[sub]2[/sub]P[sub]1[/sub]IP'[sub]1[/sub]P'[sub]2[/sub]P'[sub]3[/sub]...P'[sub]n[/sub]
Great manuveur
Could you just change the integration order to
y->x->z ?
why is it correct though?
Indeed bob it should be proved this way.
I already asked JaneFairFox for help, for she mentioned this theorem before.
Hi bobbym, it involves the problem whether real matter is abitarily divisible. If not, there is some N that 1/10^M (M>N) of a particular piece does not make sense, like saying 1/100 of a water molecule.
Just solve
∑f(x)=1