You are not logged in.
But if we had a bridge that had only one hanger that was planar across the entire main cable, then it would be parabolic.
Yes, you could say so. but to be exact, near. because matter is made of sufficient smalls instead of continuous infinite smalls.
My point is, most of caculus's success is built on descrete approximation.
(a+d)(b+c) = 6+5+4bd
for more illustrative
<=> ⇒ a/b=q∈N ⇒ d=q[sup]c[/sup]2/π ≈ 2/3.14 =200/314=100/157
NOTICE the KNOTS (corrected), they are streched downward.
Franklin's guess is right, too. Even the knits doesn't form a parabola but a parabola-catenary mix.
For Post 12, you cannot get a parabola knits trajectory.
the tangent (slope) grows by 0, 2, 4, 6
height grows by 0, 2, 6, 10 =n(n+1)
length l= (n-1/2)Δx set Δx=1 n=l+1/2
n(n+1)= (l+1/2)(l+3/2) the function of right knits isn't symmetric about the axis in the graph, thus left knits have another function (l-1/2)(l-3/2)
Two parabolas
uh, i used to think the latex here is too old.
you can simplify
as 2+√5eazy, if a is a rational, it can be presented as N/M , where N and M are both integers.
N²/M²=a², thus a is a rational. but a is not.
to be strict 10+2√5 is rational <=>√5 is rational (proved by simple fraction algebra)
The last part is very difficult, it usually lies on a Math Analysis book's page.
Proporsition: √5 cannot be expressed as N/M, where N and M are both integers.
Proof:
suppose √5 can be expressed as N/M, thus its simpified form would be p or p/q, where p and q are both integers. it cannot be p alone, since no integer p satisfy pp=25
p²/q²=5, p²= p p =5, thus p|5 , then p²|25 and q|5 is invalid(don't know the english words)
∴when p²/q² is an integer L, L|25 but L cannot.
Hence the assumption is false.
is a hyperfunction, which cannot have an explicit expression
difficult, lol
it has no solution, my software told me
Can anyone solve it explicitly out?
find positive irrantional a, who satisfies a²=10+2√5
Try this
yeah
Reread the determinant properties, and then you will understand
|column1 column2 column3a+column3b|
=|column1 column2 column3a|+|column1 column2 column3b|
decompenent the last colume, and reform
| X X² 1 +X³ | |1 X X² | |1 X X²|
| Y Y² 1+Y³ | = -1(- 1)| 1 Y Y² | +XYZ| 1 Y Y²| = (1+XYZ)VD
| Z Z ² 1+Z³ | |1 Z Z ²| | 1 Z Z ²|
VD -Vander monde Determinant
if x≠ y≠ z
xyz=-1
Many thanks, mathsyperson
How does the point move?
good luck
\times
[ \left[ \begin{array}{ccc}
a & b & c \\
d & e & f \\
g & h & i \end{array} \right)\]
The poor of induction
Russel once said this story
a hen saw her master giving her food one day.
she saw the same thing the 2nd day, the 3rd day...
after many many days, she concluded an ultimate truth based on induction
- he will always give me food.
the next day, she was killed by her master.
This is a philosophical attack on all human knowledge, and a underpinning concept of many films, such as Matrix.
Here i say, imagining infinity is an art, you can have whatever imaginations as you like.it's like Plato's idea. there isn't too much sense...