You are not logged in.
x = -(b) +&- √(b)² - (4(a)(c)) / 2(a)
You get a, b and c from ax^2 +bx +c -> 2x^2 - 1x - 2
so a = 2, b = -1 and c = -2.
Put these into the quadratic formula:
-(-1) + √(-1)² - (4(2)(-2)) / 2(2) =
1 + √1² + 16 / 4 =
4.5
The working above shows you on solution for the +, you must change that to a - to work out the second solution!
I think you're getting the quadratic formula wrong...
so if f(3) = 0 and f(-2) = -40, what are the values of a and b? I've been bearing in mind that c = 0 to work this out but I always end up with fractions in my answer, the book says a and b are integers.
I have an expression: f(x) = x^3 + ax^2 + bx + c which is divisable by x. Does this mean that
f(0) = (0)^3 + a(0)^2 + b(0) + c = 0 and thus c = 0?
beat ya mathsy
I went back to this question and tried it out myself.
firstly I divide f(x) by one of the factors (x + 1). Then I take the quotient and divide that by the other factor (x - 1). I am now left with the quadratic 3x^2 + 7x + 4 which I factorise into (3x + 4) and (x + 1).
Thus the factors are:
(3x + 4)(x - 1)(x + 1)(x + 1) == (3x + 4)(x - 1)(x + 1)^2
As always, thanks for the help
find 1% of £20 i.e. divide it by 100.
20/100 = 0.2 (20 pence) == 1% of £20
now multiply this by 8 to find 8%.
If you have one cake and divide between people they get half each - this is fractions. 2 x 1/2 = 1 (two halfs equal one whole). Another way to look at it is to say they get 50% each because just as 1/1 is a whole cake, 100% is also the whole cake. Since 50 is half of one hundred and they each get half of the cake, they are receiving 50% of the cake each.
You can also look at it as 1/2 (one divided by two) = 0.5! 1.00 is the whole cake and 0.50 is half of it i.e. 50%.
Go to www.google.com and have a look for GCSE mathematics material and I'm sure you will come up trumps.
P.S. GCSE is the british exams that all state school children take at around 16 years of age.
I cannot divide 3x^4 + 7x^3 + x^2 - 7x - 4 by x^2 - 1 directly (not using my method of long division at least). If I divide by (x + 1) I am left with a cubic expression 3x^3 + 4x^2 - 3x - 4. Do I need to divide this by the other factor (x - 1)?
how do I divide f(x) by x^2-1?
long division of x^2 - 1/f(x) just like you said krassi?
I cannot seem to make this work
x^2 - 1 / 3x^4 + 7x^3 (just to start)
so I divide 3x^4 by x^2 to give me 3x^2.
I then multiply 3x^2 by x^2 and then by -1 to give me 3x^4 - 3x^2.
I place this underneath 3x^4 + 7x^3 and subtract it, 3x^4 - 3x^4 = 0 as I would expect but I cannot subtract -3x^2 from 7x^3...
Do you know what is the polynomial division?
Nope, no idea
I just looked at what I could do to (x - 1) to make (x^2 - 1). I only got (x - 1) in the first place beause I misread the book! So that was luck, then fgarb pointed out that it was one of the factors anyway.
f(1) = 3(1)^4 + a(1)^3 + b(1)^2 - 7(1) - 4 = 0
a + b = 8
f(-1) = 3(-1)^4 + a(-1)^3 + b(-1)^2 - 7(-1) - 4 = 0
-a + b = -6
Thus: a = 7 and b = 1.
How do I go about factorising f(x) now? Do I use the same long division method I have been using on cubic polynomials?
(x^2 - 1) / (x - 1) = x + 1!
I do indeed know how to find a and b if I have two factors but I really have no idea how to get the second factor. What must I do to x - 1 to make x^2 - 1?
Maybe I must simply guess the other factors and put them into f(x) and test different values of a and b from f(1) till I find another that makes f(x) = 0?
(x^2 - 1) / (x - 1) = ???
Try breaking (x^2-1) up into its constituent factors and applying them part by part
How do I do this? I've never seen such a factor before.
That is the question, aye. The other questions give you two factors to work from. Let my type the question exactly as it is written (I've just noticed somthing that I did not see before as it was smudged over with ink!);
"Given that (x² - 1) is a factor of the polynomial f(x), where f(x) = 3x^4 + ax^3 + bx^2 - 7x - 4, find the values of a and b and hence factorise f(x) completely."
I'm assuming that the x² instead of simply x in the factor plays a vital role here, I have not seen this before.
In this question I am given the polynomial f(x) = 3x^4 + ax^3 + bx^2 - 7x - 4 and the factor (x - 1). I need to find the values of a and b. If I put the factor into the polynomial I get
a + b = 8
but there are many numbers that can be added to make 8, I do not know how to get another factor since there are two unknown constants in the polynomial!
what does the % operator do?
I'm still having quite a bit of confusion over finding the co-efficients of the x in (dx + e) (fx + g). I can follow your examples and do other similar sums myself but I want to know an exact way of getting those co-efficients for my C++ based computer program.
for(i=0; i<255; i++){
for(j=0; j<255; j++){
while(a*c==i*j & b==i+j){ cout << "(x + " << i << ")(x + " << j) };
}
}
a, b and c are doubles entered by the user, how do I expand this program to take in values of a (ax^2 + bx + c) that are not 1 and then display the co-efficients of x in the answer?
y = -1/x rotates the curve in the x-axis
and
y = 4/x scales in the y-direction
are the "correct" answers shown in my a-level book. I don't see why they switch between y and x axis?
I guess that it'll land in akward position between two objects and thus land neither on heads or tails
Where did you learn maths Old_dad?
My dad teaches maths in a secondary school (in the UK) yet he knows nothing about mathematics!!!
A lot of state school teachers in the UK are basically baby sitters.
so y=2x² doubles each y co-ord and since y=1/2x² halfs each, that has the same effect as doubling each x co-ord?
With a curve of y=1/x, it gets scaled in both directions when the integer(1) there changes?
I have a question here that asks to explain the transformations and sketch the graph of
y=4/x
I know that on a graph of y=x² you can put y=x²+z and the curve will be moved along the y axis by z. y = (x+z)² will move it along the x axis by z (but with a reversed sign). Similarly y=2x² will double each y co-ordinate; How would I write it so that each x co-ord is doubled?
Also, back to my original question on the curve of y = 1/x, if y = -1/x rotates the curve in the x-axis, why is y = 4/x supposedly scaling in the y-direction?