You are not logged in.
Happy birthday to this chap!
[list=*]
[*][/*]
[/list]
[list=*]
[*]
[list=*]
[*]
Thanks Bob!
Why doesn't your diagram have OA as diameter? The equation of the circle is
[list=*]
[*]
which can be rearranged as
[list=*]
[*]
Does not that make OA the diameter?
Do I get a medal for solving this tough problem?
Let A be the point (p,q). The circle is
[list=*]
[*]
Clearly the circle passes through the origin O and the point A and has radius OA/2. Thus OA is the diameter the circle.
Because of symmetry we can assume WLOG that p, q > 0 (i.e. A is in the first quadrant). Let a chord drawn from A intersect the x-axis at (t,0). One end of the chord is A; if the axis bisects it, the other end would be (P,Q) where:
[list=1]
[*]
Susbstiting (x,y) = (P,Q) into the equation of the circle and simplifying gives the following quadratic equation in t:
[list=*]
[*]
This equation has two real and distinct solutions in t; therefore its discriminant is strictly positive:
[list=*]
[*]
It's not a trapezium; it's a kite.
Find the area of triangle OAT and multiply by 2. (Then subtract the area of the sector of the circle.)
204. Find the first terms of the sequence given by
and for n > 2.
EAIOU
behaviour
edacious
gelatinous
gregarious
mendacious
nefarious
precarious
predacious
tenacious
veracious
vexatious
hellacious
UAIOE
glutathione
quadripole
ultraviolet
unfashioned
Yes, that works fine. It's along the lines of what zetafunc suggested in post #2.
No. Try n and n+2 for n even.
[list=*]
[*]
It's been a while since I read a detective thriller by Norwegian crime-fiction novelist Jo Nesbø. For those of you know not familiar with this writer, he is the creator of the policeman Harry Hole. In the last book I read, Phantom, Hole has a son called Oleg. I thought that was a disappointment - because I thought he should have called him Bart. In fact he should have lots of children, all of them boys and all of them called Bart. Some of them would be adopted - but some would be biologically his. This would mean...
I think it's like. this. Let
[list=*]
[*]
Well, I think you've worked out the problem correctly using calculus, so never mind Wolfram|Alpha.
This problem is typical of olympiad inequality problems requiring quick manipulations using algebra rather than calculus. Thus, applying AM–GM, we have
It is easily seen that in the interval the expression attains a maximum at , the maximum being . Hence the minimum of in that interval is and so:Grrr, silly me. For #185 I used sin instead of tan. I am really angry with myself.
[list=*]
[*]
This is < 0 when k < 1 and > 0 when k > 1.