You are not logged in.
It's all very easy if you get the basic concepts, in my opinion. Math is sort of like sports too. Repetition, practice, and exposure to a variety of examples just makes it a lot easier later on.
Nothing's THAT hard if you really work hard enough on it, and get help (whether from here or your teacher) when it is needed.
No matter what, you will have to have an email address in order to register.
It is primarily because site owners do not want robots to register and flood their forums. Plus if you ever forget your password, you can retrieve it with your email address.
Ask your brother to help you make a Hotmail (Windows Live), Yahoo, Gmail, etc password. You can co-share it for your own safety.
-Anakin.
Thanks Bobbym.
I found a program called VUE: http://vue.tufts.edu/
Just posting it in case someone in the future sees this post.
And Happy Holidays to you too, and to everyone else!
Yeah, I tried one a while back but it had trouble fitting and adjusting the shapes with more information.
If you recall, I hope you can post them sometime.
I'll start thinking of the content now.
Ah darn. I wish there was some software that could make a good mind map if given the info.
My arm's in a sling so it's gonna be a little troublesome drawing the map. I'll see what happens.
Yeah, it is pretty terrible.
But I just wanted some of the ideas. Have you got some yourself?
This one looks interesting: http://www.gogeometry.com/education/trigonometry_mind_map.html
But I'm not to go into Calc yet.
For that one, if you memorize the multiplication table up to 12, it would really help.
The way that question would through my head is as so: I know 12x12=144. 132 is 12 less than 144 so the answer must be 11.
I guess I'd try to to figure out if I know any even simpler equation (12^2=144) and compare it to the current question (132/12).
But that's just me..
EDIT: Gosh, that was a bad bump. Didn't realize when the thread was made. Sorry.
Basically I have to create a mind map on Trigonometric Functions and Equations.
So far this is the best I've seen: http://i48.tinypic.com/knfyb.jpg but is quite terrible.
I take no credit for it, it's not mine.
I was hoping someone could give me ideas on what to include. We just finished this unit so everything is so general in my mind, no specifics.
So far I figured I could include similar content as the above map, plus trig identities. Then I could branch off and show how each is developed. And I could make one semi-main branch for tips on how to prove identities.
Any suggestions or ideas? Or how I could further branch off on some things?
Thank you.
Alright, will do!
f(x)=sqrt x
f(x) = x^0.5
f'(x) = 0.5(x)^-0.5
f'(x) = 0.5(1/x^0.5)
f'(x) = 0.5/sqrt(x)
Wow, that is REALLY cool. Quite simplified (at least for these basic functions).
Just to reconfirm to make sure I'm taking the right message home: For the derivative, the co-efficient is the power of the term multiplied by the original co-efficient, then all that is multiplied by the original variable to the power of n-1 (where n was the original power) to get the derivative.
Ex.
f(x)=4x^3-2x^2
f'(x) = 3 (4)(x)^2 - 2(2)(x)^1
f'(x) = 12x^2 - 4x
That is the correct concept behind what we discussed today, as to my understanding now.
And, I looked at that link, and tried all the functions without looking at the answer, and got them all!
Ah, I think I'm getting it now.
So taking the following: f(t)= -16t^2+100t
f'(t) = 2(-16)(t)^1 + 1(100)(t)^0
f'(t) = -32t + 100
So the exponent is only applied to the variable (in our case 't') and not the constant, right?
Hmm, the 2nd step is what I was concerned about. Thanks for clearing it up, that would make a bit easier to imagine. And the 3.125 was not even used, so no numbers.
And as for the last two formulas, I don't understand them. The D(x^n) = n * x^(n-1) : So for the first term we have -16(h+t)^2. Why isn't it -16(h+t)^1 then, since n-1 = 2-1 = 1.
Hmm, so that's how you differentiate it. I was just fooling around on paper and got that. I didn't think it was right so I didn't post it but here's how I did it:
f(t)=-16t^2+100t = -16(t-3.125)^2
df(t)/d(t) = -16(t-3.125+h)^2 - (-16(t-3.125)^2)
= [ -16h^2-32th+100h-16t^2+100t-156.25+16t^2-100t+156.25 ] / h
= [ -16h^2-32th+100h ] / h
= -16h-32t+100
But we're trying to find the limit as h approaches zero so -16(0) = 0.
=-32t+100
Did I get lucky or was that really how it should be done?
Also, I changed the f(t) = -16t^2+100t into -16(t-3.125)^2. Was that necessary in order to incorporate 'h' into the parenthesis? Or could I have kept it in expanded form?
Um. You said to observe where the maximum was. I did so and got 156.25.
Then I took f(t) = 100 t - 16 t^2 and subbed in 156.25 for f(t) to solve for t:
156.25 = 100 t - 16 t^2
16t^2-100t+156.25=0
16(t-3.125)^2 = 0
t=3.125
Or I could have used completing the square but that does not involve calculus so I didn't post it.
Or did you want me to use a specific method in mind? I thought about using the lim (h→0)〖(f(x+h)-f(x))/h 〗formula but did not know where to go.
Ok. Sorry.
So yes, the maximum height of the ball is 156.25 achieved at t=3.125 as I visually observed.
Very well. But what I meant was how could I find the maximum/minimum by using that algebraically?
By eyeballing, it looks like the max height is about 156.25.
As for f prime of t, how do I incorporate that into this?
Excellent! That can only apply for lines?
Hmm, and do you have some more thought-requiring questions?
http://www.mathsisfun.com/graph/function-grapher.php?func1=7-x/3&func2=3x-5&xmin=-20&xmax=20&ymin=-12.8333333333333&ymax=13.8333333333333
That's what I get when I graph them. But for the life of me, I can't seem to notice anything significant.
Wait, is it because they are perpendicular to each other? Which would be due to the negative reciprocal of the slope, right?
I tried graphing them but the only differences I notice between y=5-x/15 and y=7-x/3 are the different y and x-intercepts. And the different slopes. Nothing else.
And for y=3x-5 and y=7-x/3, the derivatives of the two are negative reciprocals.
What am I missing?
Not much to comment on that but I've always been told and taught that csc(x), cot(x) and sec(x) do not equal sin-1, cos-1 and tan-1. Because sin-1, cos-1 and tan-1 are the sine inverse, cosine inverse and tangent inverse functions.
Csc(x), cot(x) and sec(x) are the reciprocal functions of the sin(x), tan(x) and cos(x) functions. Not the inverse of them.
Hurray!
And y=3x-5 has a slope or derivative of 3. The line y=7-x/3 has a slope or derivative of -1/3.
The derivative of any point on the line y=3x-5 is 3. The derivative of any point on the line y=5-x/15 is equal to -1/15. So basically those are the slopes of the line.
Hmm I get the feeling that I'm missing something.