You are not logged in.
Was she involved with feminism?
Was she a scientist?
Yes, it was Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.
1. Man. dead
2. Yes, he died before the 20th century
3. No, he was not involved in the arts.
4. Yes, he was a scientist.
5. No, he was not born in the British Isles.
6. Yes, he was alive in the 18th century.
7. Yes, he was German
8. No, it was not Carl Friedrich Gauss
1. Man. dead
2. Yes, he died before the 20th century
3. No, he was not involved in the arts.
4. Yes, he was a scientist.
5. No, he was not born in the British Isles.
6. Yes, he was alive in the 18th century.
7. Yes, he was German
1. Man. dead
2. Yes, he died before the 20th century
3. No, he was not involved in the arts.
4. Yes, he was a scientist.
5. No, he was not born in the British Isles.
6. Yes, he was alive in the 18th century.
1. Man. dead
2. Yes, he died before the 20th century
3. No, he was not involved in the arts.
4. Yes, he was a scientist.
5. No, he was not born in the British Isles.
1. Man. dead
2. Yes, he died before the 20th century
3. No, he was not involved in the arts.
4. Yes, he was a scientist.
1. Man. Dead
2. Yes
3. No
I will go next.
1. Man. Dead
Was she Ann RadCliffe?
Was she born in England?
Was she a scientist?
He could have been a household name like Einstein, Newton or Da Vinci had he chosen to apply his skills more productively.
has some of what he wrote on a range of different subjects.
On another note, here is an interesting article of which people like him don't suceed in life
["forum with an x" - a good idea but already taken]
This also reminds me of something.
Read about this guy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reid_W._Barton He was taught many things very early. See how he became.