You are not logged in.
It's a brilliant website. I'm referring to mathisfun.com. It's so easy to follow and I can understand the concepts extremely quickly. The pictures and gifs help a lot. When I am going through a book or something I just look on there to understand the concept first. Then I can continue with the book. It's so much easier that way rather than trying to figure it out on your own if the book doesn't explain easily. I find the this part is this, that part is that, images to be the best way of learning for me.
<-- Random Generator
Go to a university, take courses in those 4 subjects, major in the two you enjoy most, do an online degree for another subject (or do a triple major - some do it).
Good luck!
You have to major straight away in the UK. The degrees aren't so well rounded here. They're more specialized and require more self study vs lecture time. They usually last 3 years so you have to pick your major before you start. I think you can pick for example math and physics. But you would only do the bare minimum requirements for both math and physics. Whereas if you studied one you would do lots of optional topics that you wont have time to do if studying a dual degree.
So you are blacklisted? Can you move away from that area?
Yes I have guaranteed access to your country.
If this is personal, then I'm sorry, but you're blacklisted?
We had a 53 year old graduating with a PhD in Physics and got a good research based job. Can you answer some of the questions in my last post, if you don't mind?
the type of person who won't get employed'?
I have always been a bit of a rebel. I need to know why we're doing what we are. I have obsessive compulsive disorder when it comes to analyzing things. I like to see improvement and refinement. If I see a better easy way to do something I wont take no for an answer. It lead to problems with me in school. I kept asking questions and trying to change the rules so they got fed up with me.
Why do you want a math degree?
I don't really care if I get one. I want to learn maths because it's fun and can be applied to so many situations. A degree just gives me credibility to people and a higher chance of getting employed.
In which field do hou want a job?
I don't know yet. Something that I can continually learn doing. I want it to involve creativity and not to repetitive. I'm still undecided of what I want to do but it would be related to Maths, physics, computer science or engineering. I don't know what I want to do yet but I like experimenting, discovering and creating things.
I am blacklisted on a database that is shared between some companies here. Also if I did a degree I would be close to 27-28 by the time I finished. I would also have virtually no work experience. Who would employ me then? I would also be debt ridden.
Why do you think it should be a last option? It's crazy for me to accumulate $50-80 of debt to do a mathematics degree when I'm the type of person that wont get employed. I can do an online degree that will cost a fraction of that or simply study online in my own time.
I mainly want to know if there's anything you do on a mathematics degree course that I wouldn't be able to do sitting at home behind a computer. Or anything that I would struggle to do on my own. I'm thinking of doing an online degree.
I mean what does the average weekly schedule look like? I want to know what they do because I'm considering doing a mathematics degree but I might not. I want to know exactly what they do during a degree course. Do they goto lectures, do problem sets and what are they like? Do you just learn new concepts and apply the rules, and procedures like in school.
I don't want to trouble you guys since I'm doing elementary topics which are probably second nature to you. But I want to know if there are any resources online I can use to check my proofs. I am pedantic and want to make sure I get the basics right so that I'm comfortable when I move on to more complex material that builds on the foundations. Rocky foundations are never good.
Like I will do things like this...
To prove if n is even, then (-1)^n = 1
2m = n
(-1)^2m
(-1)(-1)^m
1^m = 1
I don't know if it's acceptable. Also I'm trying to prove virtually ever rule I know as I go along and I don't have a proof that 1^m = 1 for all cases even though it does.
bleh I don't like trig. I will memorise them when I start doing trig. Focusing on algebra right now. Thanks for the tips though.
Finished memorizing all the above. xD I'm starting to think I can actually get good at math in the time I wanted.
I keep asking on here so can people just post good resources they know. I'm currently going through the precalculus course in Coursera even though I know virtually everything so far. I just need to pick up little important details I missed. Some of these only cover up to high school math or the math you might get in the first year of college.
https://class.coursera.org/precalculus-003/wiki/Week3
www.m4ths.com
www.examsolutions.net
http://www.hegartymaths.com/
kahnacademy
www.mathisfun.com
www.mathpolis.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Mathematics
http://www.wyzant.com/resources/lessons/math/
http://www.teaching.martahidegkuti.com/shared/lnotes/lecturenotes.html
www.brilliant.org
please add websites and books to the list.
Okay Just wanted to check on here because I'm trying to prove some of these thereoms on my own using 2n and 2n±1
Why can say 2n = even and 2n + 1 is odd. That is based on experimentation right? There is no proof for this as far as I know. But from this you can prove if a number divdes by 2 it's even etc. Well how is it different from having a formula for PI that only works up to a certain number? I haven't heard of any logic that shows 2n is even in all cases. This seems like an axiom to me.
cube numbers upto 12 - marginally important
divisibility rules - What rules do you mean?
binomial expansion to degree 5, difference of squares - Binomial not needed.+ times + = +
- times - = +
- times + -Those are super important.
I just learnt this
+ times + = +
- times - = +
- times + -
and BIDMAS, only add like terms, indice rules, linear+quadratic equations, a bit of coordinate geometry. and that pretty much completes your algebra education at school to the degree of a 16 year old.
Currently memorizing:
cube numbers upto 12
divisibility rules
binomial expansion to degree 5, difference of squares
I'm wondering if I should bother trying my own proof and memorizing the proofs for things such as:
(-a)(-b) = ab
I didn't even learn any of these rules. I just know
+ times + = +
- times - = +
- times + = -
or the same signs = + different signs = - I had no idea these worked because of other rules that are derived. I'm just wondering if it will hurt me later on. I just learnt a=-b if a+b = 0. I could write a basic proof because of this new knowledge where I substituted or the identity. I wouldn't have been able to write the proof. This is so basic and I did not know. I'm wondering how much it would benefit me and if I need to prove and memorize these rules and identities because it will take me a while. I don't want any it to haunt me later if I don't memorize them like timestables.
ganesh's problems too.
Where can I find Ganesh's problems?
Anyone use brilliant.org? There problems are entycing. I can't solve them half the time though xD Is that website a good test of mathematical skill?
Something strange happened today. I had taken a day off from math. Today when I went back to the book it seemed kind of easy even though it seemed confusing before. I was easily doing what seemed confusing at first. This is the 2nd time this week this has happened. When you get stuck I would assume struggling to figure it out is the way forward. However I just skimmed over everything I had covered and went off to relax or do something else. Somehow it all made a lot more sense the next day. Weird right? I feel lazy stopping at every hurdle since it's slow progress but for some reason it works.
At present, there is no online source available that provides mathematics at the high school level in a rigorous sense. It's unfortunate, but true.
Well I'm using them as a supplement to the books so it should be fine.
I noticed old books seem to teach in a similar style but the new books I go through simplify everything and just show you the procedures. I can solve many of the problems but explaining why is new to me and I don't know why lol. Well there are some online resources like Kahnacademy & mathisfun to help me on parts if I get stuck. I like this book proves a lot from the ground up. It's just going to take me longer than expected. Also a lot at the back I haven't even covered before.
Thanks Shivam for helping me realize how much of a novice I am. Lol I don't even understand mathematics. I just oversimplified the rules in my head so that I could apply the rules without even knowing them. There is no definition or why in school. I'm finding the exercises in the book kind of hard because I'm not used to going from definitions to showing and proving. Usually I just copied the procedure to solve a problem. Proofs can be confusing especially since there are multiple ways sometimes.
I mean I understand the commutative law but why is there even an associative law? It's just there are only addition operations and the commutative law which allows you to ignore the precedence rule of parenthesis. Well that's how I always thought of it.
You need a C in GCSE English most the time. They want your English to be up to the standard that you can learn from the books you read, assignments, etc and write reports, essays, and a dissertation at the end.