You are not logged in.
I wouldn't want to live in the past since there is no time in the past that has been as good as life now. I wouldn't be a Pharaoh of Egypt or Emperor of Rome in place of my life now, as an average citizen. We are very lucky to be living in this time and age.
As for my favorite era in history, I would have to say recent history, especially Australia's because I find it the most relevant to my life.
If you're enthusiastic about maths, I'm sure you'd make a wonderful teacher ![]()
what is this Countdown? ![]()
So I'm like, trilingual and a half:
I can speak English, 1337, bad Engrish, and I'm learning chinese![]()
Those were way hard ![]()
We got this from our P.E teacher when we had nothing to do in class, so here goes:
Pick a 4 digit number where the same digit is not repeated:
e.g
1234
Now find the number which is made up of the digits reversed:
4321
Now subtract your original number from it:
3087
Multiply the result by any number from 1 to 9, e.g:
3087*4
= 12348
Now circle any digit in the number and say the other digits of the number. Given the other digits, another person would be able to solve for the circled digit. How is this so?
...so long as they're describing the abstract. I hate problems which are practical and which can be applied to everyday life.
State whether the following sequences are geometric or algebraic and state the nth term:
16. 1.25, 2.75, 4.25, 5.75
17. 3, -3, 3, -3
18. 2, 4, 8, 16
19. 3, -9, 27, -81
20. 5, -1, 1/5, -1/25
Well, you've done the hard part already, just solve it as a normal quadratic now. Make one side of the equation equal to zero and use factorisation and the null factor law or the quadratic formula.
NOT ENGLISH, ENGRISH!
But then moderators would have a heap of work on their hands, considering people could just join up for the sake of pming for no apparent reason.
That's an awesome avatar haruka
, is it yuna?
oooh
how many posts do i need again?
It would great know every languages, like have world key.
i know speak engrish
I was just wondering why this forum doesn't have pms. It's quite common on other forums i've been to.
actually, only the quoted LaTeX does, the one in the original had to be... modified to fit.
Now I'm even more confused
Oh noes! It's not working! It's a disaster!
\mbox {A toast to all the quotes Toast will toast in the future!}
Ok, now solve for x:
Oh, and in case you were wondering,
Geeks are supposedly the exact opposite of cool... so...
If you get A's for everything, go on to become a theoretical hyper-dimensional topological astrophycist and earn the big bucks (in other words have a successful career), you must suffer the title of 'geek'.
Whereas you are 'cool' if, stereotypically, have a some wit, an attitude, sunglasses, and would rather party than study. 90% of people I know would like to be cool. Supposedly you can't be a geek or 'cool' at the same time. Supposedly cool people are preferred by society.
Thus, most of society will go on to become cool and the 10% of the geeks will go on to become rich, famous, and smart, (and possibly may take over the world) but will nevertheless still remain the laughing stock of the rest of the world.
Such is life.
I've never heard of any of the equations in this thread. In my studies I have always used
where ζ is Riemann's zeta function, Γ(x) is the gamma function, ∇ is the del operator, L[sup]-1[/sup] denotes the inverse Laplace transform, T[sub]n[/sub] is the nth Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind, C is a simple closed curve bounding a region having z = a as an interior point, σ[sub]0[/sub][sup]m[/sup] is a simplex of an oriented simplicial complex and [σ[sup]m[/sup], σ[sup]m - 1[/sup]] is an incidence number, S is a compact, orientable, differentiable k-dimensional manifold with boundary in E[sup]n[/sup] and ω is a (k - 1)-form in E[sup]n[/sup], defined, and C[sup]1[/sup] at all points of S, and η(x) is Dirichlet's eta function.
(Sorry for stealing your joke, Ricky.
)
...is that actually a straight line equation or is it a whole bunch of mathematical mumbo-jumbo?
So I've got my math exam coming up next week and I think I've studied a lot more than I did for last semester's. It includes the topics: Pythagoras Theorem and Surds, Formulae, Congruent and similar Triangles, Quadrilaterals, Measurement, Linear Relations, Quadratic Relations, and Trigonometry.
I've done practically every problem in the workbooks and last year's exam papers, and I went pretty well on them - is there anything else I can do to prepare or have I got every base covered?
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcba