You are not logged in.
ah, i see.
so in this case
take a guess at 4
is this method better than the +/- one, where you take two points on opposing sides of the x axis, and iteratively subdivide to gain another 1dp of accuracy? This method does seem to suffer from the same fatal flaws like the iteration one where you can only really find one root, and doesnt always work?
ye............. I would never have been able to explain this to you, good thing you figured that out yourself, I really don't understand any of this.
Yep
, and you should probably round 'x' up to 11.
You can use the Sine Rule, providing you have learnt it.
(en.wikipedia.com/wiki/sine_rule)
The rule is that one side length over its sine of the opposite angle is proportionate to another side length over the sine of its opposite angle.
Now, I'm assuming the longest side is the hypotenuse and the bottom one is x.
There is another way if you haven't learnt the Sine Rule, but it takes a lot of working:
It is shown in the image attached.
Create an imaginary square around the triangle and fill in all the missing angles, then you can use trigonometry to work out the side lengths.
A cuboid needs to be moved through the arch of the equation
.Consider the rectangular cross-section of the cuboid where the top corners of the rectangle touch the arch where the top corners of the rectangle touch the arch and the bottom of the rectangle is on the x axis. Let 'a' metres be the distance from the edge of the arch at the base (the origin) to the nearest edge of the rectangle.
The units on the axes are in metres.
i)Find the height and width of the rectangle when of the rectangle when a = 0.5
I got h=2.5m and w=2m.
ii)Find the height of the rectangle when its width is 2.5 metres.
I got h=1.375m
iii) Find, using an algebraic method, the width of the rectangle when its height is 4 metres.
I got
.
I attached the image at the bottom.
Thanks.
Oh dear, you didn't include the brackets in the first question? ![]()
Oh well, good job on completing the question.;)
P.S. I'll still try and get back to you on
Well, I can't ask him again till Thursday
.
Try just analysing the graphs of
So I was bored and decided to stuff around in paint (yes i know, I was pretty bored), I started with a circle, added a midpoint, then made all kinds of links and connections to come up with what is attached.
Then I noticed that the rectangles sorta looked familiar. Are they the golden ratio??? ![]()
Hi Thatcher, I just asked one of my friends and he said it is unsolvable using logs. He said you need to use calculus, which I haven't learnt.
Either by graphing or using a calculator I got x ≈ 0.563895524260.
A forum member should come along soon and help you with the method though, don't worry.
Thanks everyone,
I'd like to be a real member
Rida should be one too
That question implies the golden ratio, which is equal to approximately 1.618, but which really keeps going forever.
Try this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio
It gives you quite an interesting read on it, albeit possibly hard to comprehend, and if you scroll down, it shows you how to calculate it.
Well, I haven't exactly been around for that long... compared to posters like jU, so I wouldn't at all mind staying as a full member for now, I just posted this topic out of curiosity really.
Why can't you all just call it undetermined and leave it be like how they dealt with
?Can someone please check my working and answers for these, I'm not confident I got them right
http://www.mathsisfun.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=5169
Ok, firstly, these answers are not complete *YET*. This means two things,
a) Don't expect to find everything here
b) Until they are thoroughly checked, *RELY ON THEM AT YOUR OWN RISK*
ANSWERS
Thanks for the corrections Kurre, I had a feeling I was wrong. I've resubmitted Q.2 with different values.
LOL Funny!
Mmmmm, wish we had thanksgiving, I wouldn't mind an extra turkey every year...
Smart would know not to use them, and well, the rest probably wouldn't know them in the first place. That means that they are applicable to nobody.
That's great
...but my 3nglish t3acher 3xists
*Problems uploaded as JPEGs at the bottom of this post*
So, these are actually harder than the thread title says (sorry). These are all solid geometry problems.
If you want, answer all in exact simplified form before finding the decimal approximation.
Accuracy is key.
(If question 3 is too much of a pain don't attempt it)
I'll be uploading more soon.
sounds like a very popular show
, too bad we don't really have anything like that in Australia, just quick quizzes and luck games.
thanks, but nevermind lol I don't really understand what you're talking about
This term seems to be used a lot in the website, but I can't say i've heard it mentioned in class.
Please explain and give an example.