Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #11626 20130705 00:22:53
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaYou have plenty of time to change your mind. The most valuable thing that school can give you is the ability to teach yourself. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #11627 20130705 01:53:47
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI agree, and there will be a lot of that at university too. #11628 20130705 05:51:56
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaYes and you will be larning something everyday. What could be better than that? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #11629 20130705 06:20:37
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaNot many things. I like the fact that there are some nice easy modules in the first year. The Fourier series problem sheets are gifts! #11630 20130705 06:25:50
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaThey gave them to you already? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #11631 20130705 06:41:31
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaNo, I have been looking at some of the older ones online, from their official exam papers. The questions are surprisingly repetitive. #11632 20130705 06:44:05
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaIn what way. They are almost worded the same? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #11633 20130705 06:51:55
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaYes. The first part is always the same, and the question itself is only just slightly varied... for example: 2004 (a) State, without proof, the general formula for a Fourier series on (L, L), with L > 0, for a function f(x), giving the expressions for the coefficients. (b) On (π,π), find the Fourier series of f(x) = exp(x). (c) Hence or otherwise, find the Fourier series of g(x) = sinh(x) + 2cosh(x), on the range (π,π). 2005 (a) State, without proof, the general formula for a Fourier series on (L, L), with L > 0, for a function f(x), giving the expressions for the coefficients. (b) On (π,π), find the Fourier series of f(x) = x. (c) State Parseval's identity. (d) Apply Parseval's identity to the function of part (b) to obtain an infinite series for a power of π. 2006 (a) State, without proof, the general formula for a Fourier series on (π,π) for a function f(x), giving the expressions for the coefficients. (b) Find the Fourier series of f(x) = sign(x) on (π,π). (c) State and prove Parseval's identity for a function on (π,π). (d) Hence, or otherwise, prove that #11634 20130705 06:55:44
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaYea, well at least there are asking for different functions. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #11635 20130705 06:57:26
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaMeh, I guess it is not too bad... just means I am more likely to pass, so no need to revise as intensely and so more time to study more maths on the side. #11636 20130705 07:03:44
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI thought it got tougher when they started to go into FFT's. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #11637 20130705 07:07:55
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI agree, Fourier transforms are a lot more difficult conceptually. #11638 20130705 07:11:54
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaItaly? What the heck is she doing there. Another boyfriend? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #11639 20130705 07:13:29
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI think she is going there with friends. But she followed it up with "then I'm going to spend a month with my boyfriend in Cyprus" followed by a nice big bright yellow smiley face. Because, you know, there's no harm in rubbing it in. #11640 20130705 07:16:59
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaThey are meaner than a starved pit bull. But that was a good favor to you. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #11641 20130705 07:20:03
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaYeah, she doesn't seem like the type of person I want to be hanging around with, anyway... #11642 20130705 07:22:17
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaThat is one thing but those little digs will really do more for you than 5800 posts with me. Each one will make you a bit harder and meaner, and they will appreciate that. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #11643 20130705 07:26:03
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI don't know about that. As a result of this thread I am definitely a lot more detached and uncaring about their antics than I used to be. #11644 20130705 07:35:00
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaNope, this thread had little to do with it. They are your educators. You noticed her comment, you know what she is thinking and feeling. You will begin to make changes in your strategy. Each change towards less genuine caring to insincere taking of what you want will be applauded by them. Your results will soar. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #11645 20130706 18:04:05
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaMaybe not soar, but perhaps increase gradually. #11646 20130706 18:05:32
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaThe difference between yes and no can never really be gradual. It will be as if someone turned on the light in a dark room. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #11647 20130706 18:10:27
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI guess that depends on how I approach it. If I approach one girl every 6 months, then I agree, it will be like that. If I ask 100 per hour, I think the improvements may be more gradual. #11648 20130706 18:14:16
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaIf you ask 100 per hour you will have trouble dealing with all the action. I suggest two or 3 a week to start. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #11649 20130706 18:24:24
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaBut in the meantime, there is no time to learn mathematics like the summer. Until that thirst is quenched, the girls can wait. #11650 20130706 18:32:26
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaThat is okay because once the other thirst sets in there will be no time for anything else! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 