Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #10126 20130415 23:33:43
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaHave you ever seen anything like that done before? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #10127 20130415 23:39:43
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaCan't say that I have... could be that he is correct, just using a bad, or insufficient explanation. #10128 20130415 23:43:57
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaWhat a shame. I have never worked on one like this. If you get the solution to it please post it. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #10129 20130415 23:46:19#10130 20130416 00:11:49
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaJust made a sandwich. Did not take long. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #10131 20130416 00:41:37
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaProbably my favourite food on the go, even butter sandwiches will do... #10132 20130416 00:49:57
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaYes, there is a joint distribution, but does that solve the problem. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #10133 20130416 00:52:04
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI thought it just meant 'has the distribution' in this context... #10134 20130416 00:55:29
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaThat's it, "the distribution" that is the correct phrase. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #10135 20130416 00:58:05
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaLots of posters seem to be agreeing with him though... #10136 20130416 01:01:22
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaYea, the good ones there are saying he is right. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #10137 20130416 01:09:53
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaThere was a poster called bensmith who didn't understand the solution and the answers they gave in that thread didn't help either. #10138 20130416 01:16:51
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI am looking through my library in the statistics books. Someone has to have done a problem like this somewhere. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #10139 20130416 01:18:37#10140 20130416 01:21:19
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaAre you kidding? I will be jumping up and down with joy. I would post it right here. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #10141 20130416 01:24:30
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaThe paper hasn't given it a title. Not sure what I'd call it... #10142 20130416 01:35:41
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaThat might be why I am not coming across something like it in these texts. I need to get some rest see you later and thanks bringing the problem in. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #10143 20130416 01:37:42#10144 20130416 05:04:14
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #10145 20130416 05:12:01
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaOkay, thanks. I asked Hanh and she has no clue either, she could not do the first part. If adriana comes online I will ask her what she thinks. #10146 20130416 05:17:48
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #10147 20130416 05:26:17
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI doubt she will come online to help, either. #10148 20130416 05:31:03
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaYou mean in here? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #10149 20130416 05:34:52#10150 20130416 05:39:12
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaOh, she might. Based on that question she will be needing lots of help. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 